Efficient multi-cloud cost management is critical for UK organisations using AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. While multi-cloud setups offer flexibility and compliance benefits, they often lead to hidden expenses and complex billing. Without proper controls, costs can escalate by 30% or more annually. Key challenges include over-provisioning, fragmented billing, and poor workload placement.
Here’s how to tackle these issues:
- Rightsizing and Automation: Align resources with actual needs and use autoscaling to reduce waste. Savings can reach 40–60%.
- Unified Cost Monitoring: Tools like CloudZero and CloudHealth simplify tracking across providers and improve cost visibility.
- Smart Workload Placement: Reduce data transfer fees by keeping workloads in optimal regions.
- Provider Discounts: Reserved instances and spot instances can cut costs by up to 72% and 90%, respectively.
- Governance and Policy Enforcement: Automate tagging, enforce budgets, and set alerts to maintain control.
AWS re:Invent 2022 - Multi- and hybrid-cloud cost optimization with Flexera One (PRT016)

Main Cost Challenges in Multi-Cloud Continuous Delivery
Managing multi-cloud continuous delivery environments can be a financial maze. Without careful oversight, costs can escalate quickly, impacting both budgets and operational efficiency. Let’s break down the key challenges organisations face in this space.
Resource Over-Provisioning and Poor Utilisation
One of the biggest culprits behind unnecessary expenses is over-provisioning. Companies often allocate more compute, storage, and networking resources than they actually need, usually out of fear of performance issues or because they lack real-time insights into usage.
This problem is often tied to outdated DevOps practices and manual resource management. When developers spend too much time handling infrastructure tasks instead of automating processes, resources end up misallocated across cloud providers.
Things get worse when dynamic scaling isn’t set up properly. Without effective autoscaling, resources stay at peak capacity even during low-demand periods, leading to waste. With well-tuned autoscaling policies, organisations could cut costs for variable workloads by as much as 40–60%, all while maintaining performance [3]. Add to this the confusion caused by fragmented billing, and cost management becomes even trickier.
Fragmented Cost Visibility and Complex Billing
Multi-cloud billing is a headache. Each provider has its own pricing models, billing formats, and even currency differences (e.g., GBP vs. USD), making it tough to get a clear picture of overall cloud spending.
Without standardised cost reporting, finance teams struggle to compare expenses, spot anomalies, or forecast accurately. This lack of visibility often leads to budget overruns and missed chances to optimise costs.
Another challenge is cost allocation. Inconsistent tagging practices across providers make it difficult to track spending by project, department, or customer. When these issues are combined with poor workload placement decisions, the financial impact grows even larger.
Poor Workload Placement Decisions
Choosing where to run workloads can significantly affect costs. Focusing only on individual service prices while ignoring the broader picture - like data transfer fees and compliance requirements - can lead to unnecessary expenses.
For instance, GDPR and other local regulations mean sensitive data must often stay within specific regions, like the UK. While UK-specific cloud regions might charge a premium, placing workloads elsewhere could result in compliance risks. Additionally, poorly distributed workloads can rack up inter-provider data transfer costs, which can account for 10–15% of total cloud spending for data-heavy applications. The cheapest option upfront isn’t always the most cost-effective when you factor in transfer fees and operational complexities [5].
Manual Resource Management and Missing Automation
Development and testing environments often remain active outside business hours, wasting resources. Without automation, managing these environments becomes a drain on both time and money. Implementing tools like autoscaling and scheduled shutdowns can reduce costs for non-production environments by up to 70% [4].
Governance and Policy Enforcement Problems
Governance gaps are another major issue. When teams bypass procurement processes to provision resources directly, organisations lose visibility and control. This “shadow IT” can result in unexpected costs and compliance risks.
Inconsistent tagging and labelling across cloud providers further complicate tracking and cost allocation. Without standardised practices, it’s difficult to connect resources to specific projects or departments, making financial control a challenge.
Policy enforcement also varies across providers, creating gaps in spending limits and approval workflows. These inconsistencies can lead to unauthorised spending and hinder disciplined cost management [5].
| Challenge Category | Primary Impact | Typical Cost Increase |
|---|---|---|
| Resource Over-Provisioning | Unused capacity costs | 40–60% of compute spend |
| Fragmented Billing | Poor budget control | 20–30% budget overruns |
| Poor Workload Placement | Transfer and compliance costs | 10–15% of total spend |
| Manual Management | Operational inefficiency | 30–50% operational overhead |
| Governance Gaps | Shadow IT and waste | 15–25% untracked spending |
Addressing these challenges systematically can lead to savings of 35–50%, all while maintaining application performance and reliability [5]. By tackling these issues head-on, organisations can regain control over their multi-cloud costs and operations.
Practical Solutions and Methods for Cost Reduction
UK organisations can take control of their multi-cloud expenses with these actionable strategies. Real-world examples show that some companies have managed to cut costs by 35-50% while maintaining, or even boosting, performance.
Rightsizing and Automated Scaling
Rightsizing is the cornerstone of reducing cloud costs. It means aligning your cloud resources - like compute, storage, and networking - with what your workloads actually need. Many organisations over-provision resources to prepare for peak demands, which often leads to unnecessary expenses.
Using AI for rightsizing adds another layer of efficiency. By analysing past usage data, AI-driven tools can recommend optimal resource levels. Automated rightsizing alone can lower instance costs by 35% [5].
Claritas, a consumer data solutions company, achieved a 22.5% reduction in monthly cloud bills by implementing rightsizing alongside storage optimisation and better data transfer processes. The key was matching resources to actual workload needs rather than maintaining oversized instances.
Automated scaling is another game-changer. It adjusts resources in real-time based on demand, and scheduling shutdowns for non-production environments outside standard working hours (08:00–18:00 GMT/BST) can cut costs by 20% [5]. For workloads with varying demands, well-configured autoscaling policies can save 40-60% while maintaining performance [3].
Unified Cost Monitoring and FinOps
Unified cost monitoring provides a single dashboard that consolidates spending data across providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. This simplifies tracking and gives a clear view of total expenses in pounds sterling, removing the complexity of juggling separate billing systems.
FinOps (Financial Operations) takes this one step further by fostering collaboration between finance, engineering, and operations teams. It creates shared accountability for cloud spending through data-driven decisions.
One organisation managed to slash server costs by 75%, all while improving their data streaming and analysis capabilities tenfold [2]. This wasn’t just about saving money - it was about reallocating resources to better support business objectives.
The success of FinOps lies in building cross-functional teams that regularly review spending, identify anomalies, and plan cost-saving measures. For UK organisations, ensuring financial reporting aligns with British date formats (DD/MM/YYYY) and pounds sterling is crucial for clear budgeting. With transparent spending data, strategies like smart workload placement can further refine cost management.
Smart Workload Placement
Smart workload placement ensures workloads are assigned to the most cost-effective and compliant environments. For UK organisations, this means considering factors like data residency requirements under UK GDPR. Sensitive customer data often needs to stay within specific regions, and while UK-based cloud regions might cost more, the compliance benefits and reduced data transfer expenses often make it worthwhile.
Data transfer costs can account for 10-15% of total cloud spending, particularly for data-heavy applications [5]. By keeping related workloads within the same region or provider, these costs can be significantly reduced.
A retail company discovered this when they optimised their reserved instance strategy. By treating reserved instances as a financial portfolio and aligning quarterly reviews with business forecasts, they achieved a 67% cost reduction on compute with 99.7% utilisation of committed capacity [5].
Using Provider Discounts and Commitment Plans
Provider discounts can amplify savings when paired with rightsizing and automated scaling. Cloud providers offer substantial discounts for organisations that commit to specific usage levels. Reserved instances and savings plans can save up to 72% compared to on-demand pricing for predictable workloads [2][3].
Understanding workload patterns is key. For stable production services, 1-year reserved instance terms offer flexibility with meaningful savings. For more predictable usage, 3-year terms unlock even greater discounts.
Spot instances provide even deeper savings - up to 90% [3] - and are ideal for fault-tolerant tasks like batch processing, data analysis, or development environments where interruptions are manageable.
A startup facing budget constraints utilised spot instances for non-critical workloads, achieving 30% additional savings [5]. This move extended their financial runway by eight months.
| Pricing Model | Typical Savings vs On-Demand | Best Use Case | Commitment Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserved Instances | 30-72% | Stable, predictable workloads | 1-3 years |
| Savings Plans | 30-72% | Workloads with varying instance types | 1-3 years |
| Spot Instances | Up to 90% | Non-critical, fault-tolerant tasks | No commitment |
| On-Demand | 0% (baseline) | Variable, unpredictable workloads | Hourly |
A portfolio-based purchasing approach ensures reserved instance commitments align with actual usage. By conducting quarterly reviews tied to business forecasts, organisations can avoid overcommitting and maximise savings.
Automated Governance and Policy Enforcement
Automated governance helps organisations maintain cost control across cloud platforms. Policy-as-code frameworks enforce tagging standards, usage policies, and budget limits automatically, eliminating manual errors.
Consistent tagging ensures accurate cost allocation by project, department, or customer. Automated tagging policies streamline this process, avoiding the need for time-consuming cleanups.
Spending limits and budget alerts act as early warning systems. Setting alerts at 50%, 75%, and 90% of budget thresholds allows for proactive adjustments. Approval workflows for high-cost deployments add another layer of protection against unexpected expenses.
One enterprise combined automated rightsizing, reserved instances, and automated shutdowns for development environments. The result? A 52% cost reduction while supporting a threefold growth in their customer base [5]. This shows that cost control and business growth can go hand in hand with the right automation.
Automated resource cleanup prevents unnecessary expenses in development and testing environments. Policies can terminate inactive resources after a set period, while smart scaling ensures resources are only active when needed.
For best results, these solutions should be implemented systematically. Start with quick wins, like eliminating unused resources and automating shutdowns, then move on to advanced strategies like AI-driven rightsizing and portfolio-based reserved instance planning.
Need help optimizing your cloud costs?
Get expert advice on how to reduce your cloud expenses without sacrificing performance.
Tools and Services for Multi-Cloud Cost Management
Managing costs across multiple cloud platforms requires a mix of advanced tools and expert insights. Together, these resources help tackle the challenges of multi-cloud environments, ensuring that organisations in the UK can optimise expenses while maintaining top-tier performance across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.
Cost Management Tools Overview
CloudZero is a powerful tool for real-time cost tracking and detailed cost allocation. It integrates seamlessly with AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and SaaS platforms, giving businesses an instant view of their spending trends. One of its standout features is spotting cost anomalies as they happen, allowing for swift corrective action.
CloudHealth takes a broader approach by combining cost management with governance and compliance. It provides in-depth analytics across AWS, Azure, and GCP, making it a solid choice for organisations needing to meet strict regulatory standards while keeping costs in check. Its automated policy enforcement also ensures budgets stay on track.
Harness merges continuous delivery with cost management, adding features like automated controls and feature flagging. It’s particularly useful for DevOps teams, as it embeds cost management directly into CI/CD pipelines. This reduces the need for manual oversight and minimises errors.
Each of these tools addresses specific challenges in multi-cloud environments. CloudZero’s real-time insights help prevent over-provisioning by enabling quick adjustments. CloudHealth’s unified dashboards eliminate fragmented visibility, and Harness automates cost controls during deployments, making resource management more efficient.
| Tool | Key Strengths | Supported Platforms | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| CloudZero | Real-time monitoring | AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, SaaS | Immediate cost visibility |
| CloudHealth | Governance and compliance | AWS, Azure, GCP | Regulatory compliance |
| Harness | CI/CD integration | AWS, Azure, GCP | DevOps teams |
While these tools lay the groundwork for effective cost management, expert guidance can amplify their impact.
Hokstad Consulting's Services

Hokstad Consulting complements these tools with customised solutions designed to optimise multi-cloud costs for businesses in the UK. Their services align with local regulations and business needs, ensuring organisations can achieve both compliance and efficiency.
Cloud Cost Audits are at the core of their offerings. These audits thoroughly analyse existing cloud expenses, uncover inefficiencies, and provide actionable steps for rightsizing, automation, and optimal workload distribution. On average, UK businesses see potential savings of 20–40% through these audits.
Their DevOps Transformation services focus on automating CI/CD pipelines and implementing Infrastructure as Code frameworks. This approach not only speeds up deployment times - by as much as 75% - but also reduces errors by 90%[1]. Automation further cuts operational costs and eliminates manual bottlenecks.
For businesses looking to transition, Strategic Cloud Migration services offer tailored solutions, whether hybrid, private, or public cloud setups. These migrations are designed to balance cost, performance, and security, all while avoiding vendor lock-in. The process includes zero-downtime migrations and integrates cost-saving measures from the outset.
Hokstad also provides AI-driven Automation, a cutting-edge service that uses artificial intelligence to predict usage patterns, allocate resources efficiently, and detect cost anomalies in real time. AI agents handle compliance checks and enforce policies, ensuring governance standards are met without manual intervention.
Another key offering is Custom Development & Automation, which delivers bespoke solutions for unique organisational needs. By automating repetitive infrastructure tasks, businesses can achieve deployment cycles up to 10 times faster[1], freeing up valuable developer resources.
Finally, their Cloud Cost Engineering service employs proven strategies like rightsizing, automation, and intelligent resource allocation to cut cloud spending. UK clients often see reductions of 30–50% in their cloud expenses[1], with intelligent workload placement ensuring compliance with data residency requirements.
Hokstad Consulting often aligns its fees with the client’s savings, charging a percentage of the cost reductions achieved[1]. This results-driven model has enabled clients to save over £50,000 annually on infrastructure[1], all while improving operational efficiency.
Their integration of AI extends beyond traditional DevOps, incorporating machine learning to forecast costs and optimise resources. This ensures UK organisations can maintain predictable cloud expenses while scaling their operations effectively.
Implementation Steps for UK Organisations
Managing multi-cloud costs can feel like a juggling act, especially for UK organisations navigating local regulations, currency formats, and unique business challenges. To make the process manageable, a structured approach is essential.
Assess Current Spend and Identify Inefficiencies
Start by gathering detailed billing data from all your cloud providers, ensuring costs are clearly reported in pounds sterling (£) and formatted to UK standards (DD/MM/YYYY). This step lays the groundwork for spotting where your money is going - and where it shouldn't be.
Take a closer look at usage reports from providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. Pay special attention to how your resources are being utilised. Are there idle servers during weekends or bank holidays? Could development environments be shut down automatically outside working hours? These are common culprits for unnecessary expenses in UK organisations.
Data transfer costs can also sneak up on you. Moving data between regions or providers often leads to unexpected charges. Similarly, storage costs deserve scrutiny - do you really need multiple copies of the same data, or premium storage tiers when standard options would suffice?
Compare your actual usage against your original forecasts and budgets. Many organisations find gaps here, with rightsizing offering potential savings of 20-40%[3]. Once you've completed this internal review, consider bringing in external experts for a deeper look.
Bring in a Professional Cloud Cost Audit
Even with a thorough self-assessment, a professional audit can uncover inefficiencies you might miss. Specialists like Hokstad Consulting focus on cloud cost audits tailored to UK businesses, ensuring compliance with local regulations and business practices.
These audits go beyond your internal findings, analysing architecture, spending patterns, and opportunities for automation. They also evaluate your commitment plans and reserved instance usage to ensure you're getting the best value without overcommitting. Plus, they check if your setup aligns with UK data residency requirements, keeping you compliant while cutting costs.
Professional auditors often spot hidden issues like zombie resources, poor auto-scaling setups, or unnecessary premium storage. Their objective recommendations can provide a fresh perspective and actionable strategies to optimise your cloud spending.
Deploy Monitoring and Automation
Once you've identified inefficiencies, it's time to implement systems that ensure ongoing cost management. Real-time monitoring tools can track spending and utilisation across all your cloud providers, helping you keep tabs on everything.
For variable workloads, align autoscaling policies with UK business hours and seasonal trends. This approach can slash costs by 40-60%[3]. Automate scheduling for non-production environments, like shutting down development resources during evenings, weekends, and bank holidays - a move that could save up to 70% on non-critical workloads[4].
Set up anomaly detection to flag unusual spending patterns in real time. Ensure alerts are configured to notify your team during UK business hours so they can act quickly.
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) frameworks can embed cost controls directly into your deployment process, preventing costly mistakes before they happen. You can also automate resource tagging for cost allocation and enforce policies that block oversized or unauthorised deployments.
Establish FinOps and Governance Frameworks
A FinOps team can bridge the gap between technical and financial stakeholders, creating shared accountability for cloud spending. This cross-functional approach ensures that cost considerations are factored into every architectural decision.
Governance frameworks are equally important. They should define clear policies for provisioning resources, allocating costs, and complying with UK data protection laws. Approval processes for new cloud resources can help prevent unauthorised spending without slowing down development.
Unified dashboards can make cost management more transparent, showing spending trends, budget variances, and resource utilisation in a way that's easy for both technical and financial teams to understand. Accurate cost allocation models further enhance visibility, helping you see which projects deliver the best return on investment.
Policy enforcement mechanisms can prevent expensive mistakes, like deploying oversized instances or using premium storage unnecessarily. These policies should balance compliance with flexibility, ensuring your organisation stays agile while keeping costs in check.
Regular Review and Improvement
Cost management isn't a one-and-done task - it requires regular reviews to stay effective. Analyse your spending quarterly, benchmark against industry standards, and adjust your strategy as needed.
Exchange rate fluctuations can significantly impact multi-cloud costs, especially when dealing with providers that bill in multiple currencies. Develop strategies to manage this risk while maintaining predictable budgets.
Revisit your commitment plans and reserved instance allocations regularly. As your business grows, your cloud usage patterns will shift, and your cost strategy should evolve accordingly.
Stay open to new tools and strategies. The cloud landscape changes rapidly, with new features and services offering fresh opportunities for savings. Pilot these in controlled environments before rolling them out more broadly.
Finally, conduct quarterly governance reviews to assess the effectiveness of your policies and frameworks. Update them as needed to stay aligned with your business objectives and regulatory requirements. Track key metrics like total monthly spend, resource utilisation, and cost per deployment to continuously refine your approach and demonstrate the value of your efforts to stakeholders.
Conclusion: Key Points for Cost-Effective Multi-Cloud Delivery
Managing costs in a multi-cloud continuous delivery setup doesn’t have to feel overwhelming. The main culprits behind inflated cloud bills - over-provisioning, fragmented billing, and manual processes - can be tackled with targeted strategies.
UK organisations that excel in this area focus on three key pillars: automation, visibility, and strategic planning. These approaches not only reduce costs but also maintain high performance and reliability.
By implementing unified cost monitoring and adopting FinOps practices, businesses can embed financial accountability into their operations. This often translates to overall savings of 20–40% [3]. When engineering and finance teams work together with full visibility across all cloud providers, it transforms how cloud spending is managed.
Effective cost management starts with a thorough assessment, professional audits, and the establishment of robust governance. Regular reviews and continuous improvements ensure that cost strategies stay aligned with the evolving demands of cloud environments.
After optimising internal processes, seeking expert advice can amplify savings further. For UK businesses navigating complex multi-cloud setups, working with specialists like Hokstad Consulting can fast-track results. Their expertise in areas like DevOps transformation, cloud cost engineering, and strategic migration has helped organisations achieve infrastructure cost reductions of 30–50% [1]. And with their no savings, no fee
model, the financial risk is kept to a minimum.
FAQs
How can UK organisations use rightsizing and automated scaling to cut multi-cloud costs effectively?
UK organisations have a real opportunity to cut down on multi-cloud expenses by adopting rightsizing and automated scaling strategies. Rightsizing involves aligning resources exactly with workload demands, ensuring there’s no waste from overprovisioning. Meanwhile, automated scaling adjusts capacity dynamically based on real-time demand, making operations more efficient.
Hokstad Consulting specialises in helping businesses fine-tune their cloud spending by customising these strategies to fit their unique requirements. With their expertise in cloud cost engineering, they can achieve savings of 30–50%, all while boosting performance and making better use of resources.
How can businesses improve cost visibility and manage complex billing across multiple cloud providers?
Managing costs and billing across multiple cloud providers can be a tricky task, but with the right tools and strategies, it becomes much more manageable. A good starting point is to use centralised cost monitoring tools. These tools connect with your various cloud providers, making it easier to pull together billing data, monitor usage, and pinpoint areas where resources might be wasted.
Another effective approach is to categorise spending by project, team, or service. This gives you a clearer picture of where your resources are going and helps highlight any areas that might need adjustment. On top of that, setting up automated alerts for unusual spikes in spending can save you from unpleasant surprises. Regularly reviewing your bills is also essential to catch any errors or unexpected charges. Adopting these methods not only makes cloud cost management more transparent but also helps cut down on unnecessary expenses.
How can smart workload placement reduce data transfer costs and ensure compliance with UK regulations?
Smart workload placement is all about strategically distributing workloads across cloud environments to cut down on unnecessary data transfers and make the best use of resources. By positioning workloads closer to their main data sources or end-users, businesses can effectively reduce data transfer fees, which can add up quickly in multi-cloud setups.
In the UK, this strategy also supports compliance with data residency and privacy regulations, like the UK GDPR. Keeping sensitive data within the right geographical boundaries and using compliant cloud regions not only helps businesses steer clear of regulatory issues but also keeps operations cost-efficient.