How to Optimise Deployment Frequency for Savings

Deploying too often or too rarely can cost you money. To save on deployment expenses, you need to find the right balance. Frequent, small deployments reduce risks and make debugging easier, but without optimisation, they can waste resources like compute power and bandwidth. Infrequent, large deployments, on the other hand, increase complexity, risks, and operational overhead.

To cut costs and improve efficiency, focus on these key steps:

• Track Metrics: Monitor cost per deployment, resource usage, and failure rates.
• Automate Processes: Use CI/CD tools to reduce manual tasks and errors.
• Right-Size Resources: Avoid over-provisioning and shut down idle environments.
• Use Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Standardise and automate infrastructure setups.
• Deploy Smaller Changes: Frequent, incremental updates are faster and cheaper to manage.
• Leverage Temporary Environments: Create on-demand testing environments that shut down automatically.

For long-term results, consider consulting experts who can audit your processes and tailor solutions to reduce costs while maintaining reliability.

CI/CD Cost Optimisation for Dev Environment | FinOps

How Deployment Frequency Impacts Costs

Let’s dive into how deployment frequency influences cloud costs, developer efficiency, and system reliability. By understanding the mechanics behind this metric, you can better manage your expenses and optimise your processes.

What Is Deployment Frequency?

Deployment frequency refers to how often your team pushes code changes to production over a set period. It's one of the four essential DORA (DevOps Research and Assessment) metrics used to evaluate DevOps performance, alongside lead time for changes, change failure rate, and mean time to recovery.

This metric reflects your team’s ability to deliver value quickly while maintaining system stability. High-performing teams often deploy several times a day, whereas lower-performing teams may only release updates weekly, monthly, or even less frequently.

Frequent, smaller deployments tend to reduce costs and recovery times. They make it easier to identify and fix issues compared to dealing with the fallout of complex, large-scale rollbacks.

Why Too Many or Too Few Deployments Cost Money

Striking the right balance in deployment frequency is crucial to avoid unnecessary expenses. Both extremes - deploying too infrequently or too often - can lead to inefficiencies.

Infrequent, large-scale deployments come with their own set of challenges. They require staging environments to sit idle for long periods, which wastes resources. When issues arise, the complexity of these deployments increases the likelihood of failures, and recovery costs can skyrocket.

On the flip side, excessively frequent deployments can also drain resources if not optimised. Each deployment activates the CI/CD pipeline, consuming compute power and network bandwidth. Without proper efficiency measures, this repetition leads to resource waste and inflated costs.

The ideal approach? Optimised frequent deployments. By keeping releases small and manageable, you simplify debugging and reduce complexity. At the same time, a well-tuned pipeline ensures efficiency, preventing unnecessary resource consumption.

Key Metrics for Cost-Effective Deployments

To manage costs effectively, you need to track specific metrics that highlight inefficiencies. These data points help you make informed decisions rather than relying on assumptions.

• Cost per deployment: Calculate this by dividing your total infrastructure expenses by the number of deployments in a given period. It’s a straightforward way to identify and reduce waste.

• Resource utilisation during deployments: Keep an eye on CPU, memory, and storage usage. Low utilisation signals over-provisioning, while consistently high usage may indicate bottlenecks that need addressing.

• Lead time for changes: Shorter lead times mean resources are tied up for less time, leading to lower infrastructure costs.

• Change failure rate: Failed deployments come with added costs for rollbacks, hotfixes, and troubleshooting. Lowering failure rates directly reduces these expenses.

• Mean time to recovery: Faster recovery times minimise both direct costs and business disruptions, saving money and reducing downtime.

• Environment provisioning time: Faster provisioning means you spend less on compute resources, as environments are created and destroyed more efficiently.

• Pipeline efficiency metrics: Metrics like build times, test execution durations, and deployment completion times reveal opportunities to streamline your processes and cut resource usage.

How to Review Your Current Deployment Process

Taking a closer look at your deployment process can help uncover inefficiencies and unnecessary costs. The goal is to streamline operations and identify areas where resources might be wasted.

Audit Your Deployment Processes

Start by gathering data from deployment logs, cloud billing records, and incident reports. Together, these offer a clear picture of your deployment costs and performance.

• Deployment logs: Analyse timings, resource usage, and failure points. Pay attention to deployments that consistently take longer or consume more resources than others. High-demand periods can be especially costly due to dynamic cloud pricing.
• Cloud billing data: Break down expenses by service, timeframe, and deployment frequency. Staging environments often consume a large portion of the budget but may remain underutilised. Look for cost spikes during deployment windows; these could point to inefficient resource allocation or poorly timed releases.
• Incident reports: Failures like rollbacks, emergency fixes, or overtime can add unexpected costs. Reviewing the financial impact of these issues over time can highlight problem areas.

Cross-referencing these sources can reveal important patterns. For instance, certain deployment times might show higher failure rates, leading to increased support costs. Use these insights to pinpoint areas for improvement.

Track and Measure Key Performance Metrics

To effectively measure performance, you’ll need the right tools and consistent monitoring. Tools like CI/CD dashboards provide real-time data on deployment pipelines, while cloud monitoring platforms track resource usage and costs.

Focus on metrics such as:

• Cost per deployment
• Resource utilisation
• Lead time for changes
• Pipeline efficiency

Modern CI/CD platforms often include built-in analytics. Configure these tools to capture cost-related data and create custom dashboards to correlate deployment frequency with infrastructure expenses. Compare scenarios like minor updates versus major launches to assess which strategies offer the best return on investment.

Establish baseline metrics by recording average deployment times, resource consumption, and standard costs per release. These benchmarks will help you measure improvements after making adjustments. Instead of fixating on individual costly deployments, look for trends. A single expensive deployment might not be a problem, but recurring high costs could signal deeper inefficiencies.

Find Bottlenecks and Manual Steps

Manual processes in deployment pipelines can lead to delays, errors, and increased costs. Document every instance where a manual action - like a trigger, approval, or monitoring step - is required.

Common bottlenecks include:

• Manual testing phases: Environments often sit idle while waiting for validation.
• Lengthy approval workflows: These can delay releases unnecessarily.
• Ad hoc provisioning: Sudden infrastructure requests can disrupt workflows.

Resource contention is another issue. When multiple deployments compete for the same infrastructure, they may slow down or require additional capacity. Monitoring deployment queues can help identify peak usage periods and potential conflicts.

Whenever possible, run sequential processes - like tests, security scans, and quality checks - in parallel to save time and reduce costs. Watch out for environment sprawl, where temporary environments aren’t decommissioned promptly, and database issues, such as extended downtimes from schema changes or migrations.

Finally, break down the time from code commit to production deployment. Often, the actual deployment is quick, but waiting periods, manual approvals, and resource provisioning account for most of the delay and expense. Addressing these inefficiencies can significantly improve overall performance.

Methods to Reduce Deployment Costs

Once inefficiencies are pinpointed, employing targeted strategies can help cut deployment costs while ensuring quality and reliability remain intact.

Automate CI/CD Pipelines

Manual deployment processes are not only costly but also prone to errors. Automation eliminates repetitive manual tasks, reducing labour costs and lowering the risk of mistakes that might lead to emergency fixes or rollbacks.

Modern CI/CD platforms streamline builds, tests, and deployments, triggering processes based on predefined conditions. By running tasks in parallel, these tools speed up deployment cycles and reduce overhead. Automation also supports rollback mechanisms, allowing systems to quickly revert to a stable version when issues arise, cutting downtime significantly. This is much faster and less resource-intensive than manual rollback procedures, which often require multiple team members and lengthy troubleshooting.

For low-risk changes, automating approval workflows can further reduce delays. For example, minor updates like documentation changes or bug fixes can bypass manual approvals, while critical deployments continue to undergo thorough human review. This approach strikes a balance between speed and safety.

The next step is to standardise infrastructure through code for consistency and efficiency.

Use Infrastructure as Code (IaC)

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) revolutionises how deployment environments are managed. Instead of manually configuring servers and services, tools like Terraform, AWS CloudFormation, or Azure Resource Manager allow teams to define infrastructure in code.

IaC ensures that development, staging, and production environments remain consistent, while enabling rapid provisioning and automated resource decommissioning. This consistency eliminates the it works on my machine scenario, which can lead to costly debugging efforts. It also prevents the accumulation of unused resources, which can inflate costs.

Using version control for infrastructure changes adds another layer of efficiency. If an update causes problems, reverting to a previous configuration is straightforward, saving time and reducing the impact of errors. Additionally, defining infrastructure requirements in code makes it easier to estimate costs upfront and identify areas to optimise resource allocation across environments.

With infrastructure defined and automated, the next focus should be on eliminating resource waste.

Right-Size Resources and Cut Waste

Cloud resources are often over-provisioned to handle peak demand, but this can lead to unnecessary expenses. Regularly analysing resource usage - such as CPU, memory, and storage - can uncover areas to trim costs.

Many applications use only a fraction of their allocated resources during normal operations. Auto-scaling groups can dynamically adjust capacity based on demand, ensuring you only pay for what you actually use. Additionally, shutting down non-production environments outside working hours is a simple but effective way to save money. Development and staging environments often run 24/7, even though they’re rarely needed after business hours. Automating start/stop schedules can lead to significant reductions in resource consumption.

Storage is another area where costs can creep up. Over time, log files, temporary build artefacts, and outdated deployment packages can accumulate. Implementing automated cleanup policies and assigning the right storage tiers to different data types can help control these expenses. Similarly, development databases don’t always need to mirror production environments. Using smaller datasets or snapshots for testing can reduce both compute and storage costs without compromising functionality.

Finally, monitor network transfer costs and optimise data locality to minimise cross-region traffic, which can further drive down expenses.

With resources optimised, adopting smaller, more frequent deployments can bring additional savings.

Deploy Smaller Changes More Often

Smaller, more frequent deployments are not only less risky but also more cost-effective compared to large, infrequent releases. With fewer changes in each deployment, identifying and resolving issues becomes quicker and requires fewer resources.

Large deployments often demand extensive testing and complex rollback plans. In contrast, smaller changes are easier to test and deploy, reducing the need for elaborate staging environments. This also means rollbacks, if needed, are simpler and faster.

Feature flags are particularly useful here. They allow gradual rollouts and enable quick rollbacks without undoing an entire deployment. By deploying code with features initially turned off, you can test functionality with select user groups and minimise the impact of potential issues. This approach keeps emergency response efforts - and their associated costs - manageable.

As teams grow more comfortable with smaller, incremental changes, the deployment pipeline becomes more efficient. This improved workflow reduces manual intervention, speeds up issue resolution, and ultimately translates into cost savings, all while maintaining strong performance and reliability.

How to Build a Cost-Efficient Continuous Delivery Workflow

Creating a streamlined continuous delivery workflow can significantly reduce costs while maintaining speed and reliability. By cutting unnecessary processes and optimising resource usage, you can save money without compromising performance.

Use Temporary Environments

Temporary, or ephemeral, environments are a smart way to control costs. These environments are created on-demand for testing and are automatically shut down when no longer needed [1][3].

Using containers for these ephemeral environments helps maximise resource efficiency. With containers, multiple applications can share a single virtual machine, reducing both expenses and resource waste [4][5]. This method not only lowers infrastructure costs but also ensures isolated and reliable testing conditions.

For example, companies that implemented automated EC2 instance selection saw an 80% reduction in expenses [5], while Kubernetes autoscaling helped cut costs by 25% [2].

Spot instances and preemptible virtual machines (VMs) are another way to save, offering cost reductions of 70–90% compared to on-demand instances [4]. Tools like Terraform can automate the creation and teardown of these environments, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines and removing the need for manual intervention [1]. For event-driven applications with unpredictable workloads, serverless solutions like AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions are ideal. With these, you only pay for the execution time, avoiding costs for idle resources [4].

Once these environments are in place, continuous monitoring is key to maintaining cost efficiency.

Add Monitoring and Feedback

Monitoring plays a crucial role in identifying resource consumption patterns and ensuring cost efficiency. It provides real-time insights into resource usage, performance metrics, and spending, allowing for constant optimisation of deployment processes.

Automated notifications can help shut down idle ephemeral environments, ensuring resources aren’t wasted [1]. By tracking resource usage, you can identify over-provisioned infrastructure and adjust accordingly.

Regular performance feedback is equally important. Metrics like deployment success rates, rollback frequency, and issue resolution times help evaluate whether your current processes are cost-effective. Predictive monitoring tools take this a step further by analysing historical data to forecast resource needs. These tools can suggest better scaling patterns and highlight areas where costs can be reduced based on past usage and deployment trends [1].

For a more comprehensive approach, consider using monitoring tools that integrate financial data with operational metrics. This can provide a clearer picture of how deployment frequency and resource allocation impact costs, enabling smarter decision-making.

Get Expert Help for Long-Term Results

Setting up cost-efficient deployment workflows may seem straightforward, but achieving long-term success often requires specialised expertise. This expertise is crucial for fine-tuning deployment frequency in ways that lead to lasting cost savings. With the growing complexity of modern DevOps environments, businesses can struggle to spot hidden inefficiencies or implement sustainable fixes without professional guidance.

Why Expert Consulting Makes a Difference

Expert consultants bring an outsider's perspective, which helps uncover inefficiencies that internal teams might miss. They can quickly evaluate your infrastructure, pinpoint bottlenecks, and identify opportunities for improvement, delivering noticeable savings in the process.

With experience spanning various industries and technologies, professional DevOps consultants can implement strategies like CI/CD automation and Infrastructure as Code to streamline workflows and reduce costs. What sets them apart is their ability to tailor solutions to your specific needs rather than relying on generic methods. Every business has its own unique challenges, from legacy systems to tight budgets, and consultants are skilled at navigating these complexities while ensuring cost reductions don’t come at the expense of performance or reliability.

Another key advantage is the knowledge transfer many consultants provide. By training your internal teams to maintain and enhance the systems they implement, they ensure the improvements continue to deliver value long after their engagement ends. For businesses looking to achieve these tailored, lasting results, partnering with expert consultants is a direct and effective route to sustainable optimisation.

Hokstad Consulting's Approach

Hokstad Consulting offers targeted solutions designed specifically for UK businesses. Their focus is on cutting cloud costs by 30–50% through optimising deployment frequency and improving infrastructure with automated CI/CD pipelines and robust monitoring tools.

For businesses grappling with high deployment expenses, Hokstad Consulting’s cloud cost engineering services are particularly impactful. They perform detailed audits of your existing infrastructure to identify wasteful spending and implement cost-saving measures - all without compromising system performance.

To address concerns about upfront costs, Hokstad Consulting operates on a No Savings, No Fee model. This means their fees are tied to the actual savings they help you achieve, aligning their success with your financial goals.

Their expertise also extends to strategic cloud migrations, ensuring a seamless transition with zero downtime while optimising workflows for the new environment. For businesses aiming to modernise their infrastructure, this service is invaluable in achieving deployment efficiency.

In addition to these core services, Hokstad Consulting develops custom automation solutions to significantly shorten deployment cycles. They also offer expertise in AI strategies, providing tools and agents that can automate deployment decisions and manage resources more effectively.

Every consultation begins with a thorough audit and results in a tailored strategy, supported by ongoing assistance to ensure the solutions deliver long-term value. By combining technical expertise with a results-driven approach, Hokstad Consulting helps businesses unlock sustainable cost savings and operational efficiency.

Conclusion: Find the Right Deployment Frequency for Maximum Savings

Striking the right balance with your deployment frequency isn’t about deploying as often as possible or stretching it out unnecessarily - it’s about finding the sweet spot where cost savings meet operational efficiency. This guide has outlined how to achieve that balance effectively.

Begin with a detailed audit to uncover areas where resources are being wasted. Look for cost drivers such as manual processes, over-provisioned resources, or inefficient testing practices that could be streamlined.

Introduce automation into your CI/CD pipelines and use Infrastructure as Code (IaC) to minimise errors, cut down on resource waste, and establish efficient, repeatable deployment patterns. Temporary environments and simplified workflows can also play a big role in reducing both deployment times and resource consumption.

For many businesses, making these adjustments may require expert input. Bringing in professional guidance can speed up your progress towards cost-efficient deployments while helping you sidestep common challenges.

Aligning your operational improvements with expert advice can make all the difference. If you're a UK business aiming to lower cloud costs and enhance efficiency, Hokstad Consulting offers tailored solutions to help you optimise your deployment frequency and achieve your goals.

FAQs