Kubernetes Observability in Multi-Cluster CI/CD

Managing multiple Kubernetes clusters is no longer optional - it’s essential for scaling modern applications. But with this shift comes complexity. Observability is the key to navigating multi-cluster CI/CD environments effectively. It provides visibility into systems, helps detect and resolve issues faster, and ensures efficient use of resources.

Here’s the core takeaway:

• Why it matters: Observability reduces downtime, improves productivity, and saves costs by offering insights into system performance and resource usage.
• Challenges: Fragmented monitoring, configuration drift, and limited visibility across clusters make it hard to maintain consistency and reliability.
• Solutions: Use centralised monitoring (e.g., Prometheus, Grafana), distributed tracing (e.g., OpenTelemetry), and automated alerts to streamline operations.
• Business impact: Observability can cut mean time to resolve (MTTR) by 25% or more and save organisations up to 80% on Kubernetes resource costs.

This article explains how to implement observability in multi-cluster environments, tackle common challenges, and choose the right tools for your setup.

Multi-Cluster Observability with Service Mesh - That Is a Lot of Moving Parts!? - Ryota Sawada

Common Observability Challenges in Multi-Cluster CI/CD

As multi-cluster CI/CD environments grow and evolve, ensuring proper observability becomes a key factor in maintaining efficiency and reliability. The complexity of managing distributed systems across different environments, cloud providers, and regions introduces unique hurdles that can affect visibility and system performance.

Managing Multiple Kubernetes Clusters

Handling multiple Kubernetes clusters goes beyond scaling challenges - it adds a significant operational burden. One major issue is configuration drift, where manual changes or inconsistent update schedules cause clusters to diverge from their intended setup. Differences in networking configurations, storage classes, security policies, and resource constraints make standardising observability across varied cloud and hybrid environments a tough task. These inconsistencies can lead to blind spots in monitoring.

The scale of this problem is immense. With 80% of enterprises committing to multicloud strategies and 71% using three or more cloud providers [4], the complexity grows with each additional cluster. Every new cluster brings more variables to monitor, configure, and maintain.

Interdependencies between clusters further complicate matters. Robust service meshes are often necessary to manage these connections, but without the right observability tools, visualising and monitoring these interdependencies becomes a challenge.

Security and policy management across clusters also add layers of complexity. Ensuring consistent security practices, access controls, and compliance across multiple environments requires a centralised approach - something many organisations struggle to implement effectively.

Limited Visibility Across Clusters

Fragmented monitoring systems often prevent teams from gaining a clear, comprehensive view of their distributed environments. While traditional monitoring approaches may work in single-cluster setups, they often fall short in multi-cluster systems. Teams may find themselves juggling separate monitoring stacks for each cluster, which creates data silos and blocks a unified understanding of the system.

If you don't have a properly thought out incident response strategy in place, you will be much slower to respond to incidents, and may miss critical security incidents altogether. [6] – Gilad David Mayaan

The transient nature of Kubernetes workloads adds to the complexity. Applications frequently change IP addresses and locations, making it harder for traditional logging systems to track and capture these changes effectively [5].

When incidents occur, correlating data from multiple clusters becomes a manual and time-consuming process. Logs, metrics, and traces often need to be pieced together by engineers, delaying resolution. Additionally, the sheer volume of telemetry data generated by each cluster can overwhelm monitoring systems, leading to critical signals getting lost in the noise. Tool diversity exacerbates the issue, with organisations often deploying different tools for monitoring in-cluster, cross-cluster, and external traffic, further fragmenting the data.

This lack of unified visibility not only obscures the health of the system but also slows down incident resolution, leaving teams scrambling to address issues without a clear picture of what’s happening.

Impact on Productivity and Incident Response

Poor observability has a direct impact on productivity and incident response times. Without comprehensive visibility, identifying the root causes of issues across distributed systems becomes a slow and frustrating process.

Kubernetes monitoring helps you track key metrics across Kubernetes clusters and container environments, from pod-level performance to overall infrastructure health. It enables proactive issue detection, optimises resource allocation, and strengthens security by identifying anomalies early, ensuring your applications run smoothly and reliably in production. [7] – Wiz

In distributed environments, forensic analysis becomes more difficult when critical data is scattered across clusters. Engineers often have to sift through disparate data sources during incidents, which can result in incomplete fixes that address symptoms rather than root causes.

This inefficiency also affects developer productivity. Instead of focusing on building and deploying new features, teams spend excessive time troubleshooting. Without proper observability, it’s hard to pinpoint whether issues stem from code, infrastructure, or inter-service dependencies, leading to slower development cycles and reduced confidence in deployments.

Security is another area that suffers. Limited visibility makes it harder to detect vulnerabilities or respond to security incidents in real-time. A single misconfiguration in a Kubernetes setup could expose sensitive data, disrupt services, or even open the door to malicious attacks [8]. Without robust monitoring, critical indicators of compromise may go unnoticed.

The financial consequences of these challenges are significant. According to a 2024 Check Point report, the percentage of organisations experiencing cloud security incidents jumped from 24% to 61% over the past year, and 96% of organisations expressed concerns about managing risks in hybrid cloud environments [9].

Addressing these challenges requires a combination of strategic planning, suitable tools, and often expert guidance. By adopting unified practices and tools, organisations can ensure their observability solutions scale effectively with their needs.

How to Implement Observability in Multi-Cluster CI/CD

Achieving observability in multi-cluster CI/CD setups requires a structured approach to manage distributed systems efficiently. The goal is to establish practices that provide clear visibility across all clusters while keeping operations smooth.

Centralised Monitoring and Logging

A centralised dashboard for monitoring and logging is essential to break down data silos and allow teams to quickly connect events across clusters. This starts with standardising tools and metrics. For Kubernetes environments, Prometheus and Grafana are a powerful pair - Prometheus handles metrics collection, while Grafana offers visualisation capabilities [10]. For logging, platforms like the ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) or Loki are excellent choices for aggregating logs from multiple sources [10]. Since Kubernetes doesn’t store logs natively, setting up a dedicated logging system is crucial [12]. Tools like Fluentd can help collect, transform, and forward logs to these centralised systems [11].

The process involves streaming logs from all clusters to a centralised server or management platform, such as Elasticsearch, Splunk, or Graylog [11]. This consolidates scattered logs into one searchable dataset, making it easier to manage and analyse.

Consistency is key. Using the same tools, metrics, and log formats across environments makes it easier to correlate data and spot trends that span multiple clusters [13]. This is especially helpful during incidents when engineers must quickly gather insights from various sources.

When choosing monitoring tools, prioritise those with built-in support for multi-cluster environments [10]. Such tools can aggregate data from multiple Kubernetes clusters and present it on unified dashboards, eliminating the need to switch between interfaces and ensuring seamless troubleshooting.

After standardising logging and metrics, distributed tracing can take observability a step further by mapping request flows across clusters.

Distributed Tracing Across Pipelines

Distributed tracing provides a detailed view of how requests move through your multi-cluster CI/CD pipelines. It highlights performance bottlenecks and dependencies that traditional monitoring might overlook. This involves assigning a unique trace ID to each request and recording its journey through various services as spans. Each span includes metadata like duration, errors, and timestamps [16]. Together, these spans form a complete trace that shows the request’s end-to-end path.

OpenTelemetry provides a single set of APIs, libraries, agents, and collector services to capture distributed traces and metrics from your application. You can analyse them using Prometheus, Jaeger, and other observability tools. [15] - opentelemetry.io

OpenTelemetry has become the go-to standard for distributed tracing. It provides tools to capture traces and metrics from applications, with support for multiple formats. Its collector acts as middleware, relaying trace data to various backends [15].

To implement tracing, start by instrumenting your applications to generate trace data. Ensure trace IDs are passed between services as requests move across clusters. Each service should create spans and forward the trace ID, maintaining the link between different components [16]. Finally, aggregate these spans in a backend system for analysis [16].

Tracing complements metrics and logs - it doesn’t replace them. Together, these three data sources give the most complete picture of your system [14]. For example, a high-latency trace might indicate a service hitting CPU limits, which could otherwise be mistaken for an application issue [14].

Since storing all trace data can be expensive, it’s crucial to decide which traces to keep and for how long. Retain enough historical data for meaningful analysis while avoiding unnecessary costs [14].

Once trace data is in place, automated alerting ensures teams can respond quickly to emerging issues.

Automated Alerts and Anomaly Detection

In multi-cluster environments, effective alerting relies on automation that adapts to each cluster’s unique characteristics while providing a unified response system.

The best alerts focus on symptoms of potential issues rather than flagging every minor deviation in metrics [18]. This reduces unnecessary notifications and ensures alerts are actionable.

For greater visibility, implement granular alerting across nodes, pods, and namespaces [18]. Use dynamic thresholds based on historical data instead of static limits to minimise false positives caused by normal workload variations [18].

Monitoring data should feed into external platforms that generate alerts when specific symptoms arise [17]. These alerts should be meaningful, pointing administrators toward actionable problems [17].

Label-based routing can streamline alert management by directing notifications to the right teams based on services, environments, or ownership [18]. This ensures that alerts are handled by those best equipped to resolve them.

Grouping alerts by severity and namespace helps teams prioritise critical issues [18]. Adding for durations to alert rules can filter out short-term noise, preventing unnecessary notifications [18].

In multi-cluster setups, automated alerts must account for the unique norms of each cluster. Analysing historical metrics allows for thresholds that adapt to each environment’s characteristics [18].

With automated alerting in place, teams can maintain fast response times without being overwhelmed by irrelevant notifications, completing the observability framework for multi-cluster CI/CD operations. By focusing on meaningful alerts and dynamic thresholds, teams can stay efficient and avoid burnout from alert fatigue.

Observability Tools for Kubernetes Multi-Cluster CI/CD

Overview of Observability Tools

When it comes to Kubernetes multi-cluster environments, observability tools are essential for monitoring, logging, and tracing. These tools enable teams to maintain visibility across complex systems, making them a critical part of any multi-cluster CI/CD setup.

Prometheus is a top choice for metrics collection and monitoring. Known for its ability to handle time-series data, it helps detect anomalies across infrastructure components. Prometheus employs a pull-based model to gather metrics from various endpoints, making it particularly effective for infrastructure monitoring [19][20].

OpenTelemetry stands out as a robust telemetry framework covering metrics, logs, and traces. As one of the most active open-source projects under the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, it offers unified data collection and supports both push and pull models, which is a big advantage for multi-cluster deployments [19][22].

Observability requires high-quality, portable, and accurate telemetry data. OpenTelemetry's mission is to make this telemetry a built-in feature of cloud native software.
– Austin Parker, Head of Developer Relations, Lightstep [22]

Grafana is widely recognised for its data visualisation capabilities. By July 2022, it had over 900,000 active installations globally, cementing its role as a go-to tool for creating dashboards and interpreting time-series data. Grafana connects seamlessly with multiple data sources, presenting complex information in clear, user-friendly formats [21].

Groundcover takes an integrated approach by merging logs, metrics, and traces into a single platform. It also includes built-in visualisations and alerting, simplifying management by reducing the need for separate tools [19].

Devtron combines Kubernetes deployment management with observability features. It not only simplifies deployments but also provides in-depth monitoring metrics directly within its interface. For multi-cluster setups, Devtron offers native capabilities that allow users to switch between environments without leaving the platform [24][25].

Each tool has its strengths, and choosing the right one depends on specific needs. For instance, teams focused on infrastructure monitoring often pair Prometheus with Grafana, while those requiring broader application observability might lean towards OpenTelemetry. The table below outlines the key differences between these tools.

Comparison of Observability Tools

Selecting the right observability tools for a multi-cluster CI/CD environment involves evaluating their functionality, scalability, and ease of integration. Here's a breakdown:

Scalability is a key consideration. For example, OpenTelemetry handles scalability well by allowing additional collectors to be deployed without significant architectural changes [19].

Resource efficiency also varies. Groundcover uses eBPF technology to reduce resource consumption while still collecting comprehensive data [26].

Integration complexity can affect how quickly a tool can be deployed and maintained. Grafana is often praised for its ease of integration, thanks to its compatibility with a wide range of data sources [23].

The current monitoring landscape is divided between monitoring solutions targeting infrastructure and platform engineers, and application observability solutions targeting application developers... OpenTelemetry allows the application observability landscape to transition away from proprietary tools towards open standards, and this is leading to closer integration of traditional infrastructure monitoring with application monitoring.
– Fabian Stäber, Grafana Labs Senior Engineering Manager [22]

As organisations expand into multi-cloud environments, tools like OpenTelemetry and Grafana shine due to their vendor-neutral design and extensive integration options. Groundcover and Devtron also support multi-cloud setups, but their features may vary depending on the infrastructure.

Cost is another factor to consider, extending beyond licensing to include data storage, processing, and compute requirements. Teams should evaluate data retention policies, collection frequency, and the overhead of running observability agents across clusters [26].

Rather than relying on a single tool, many organisations find success by combining them. For instance, OpenTelemetry can be used for comprehensive data collection, Grafana for visualisation, and Prometheus for targeted infrastructure monitoring [19].

Best Practices for Hybrid and Multi-Cloud CI/CD Observability

To strengthen hybrid and multi-cloud CI/CD setups, implementing observability requires a structured approach. Managing diverse cloud providers, on-premises systems, and Kubernetes distributions calls for consistent and efficient practices.

Standardising Metrics and Logs

Consistency in metrics and logs is essential when working across multiple cloud providers. Variations in standards can make it difficult to correlate data, leading to fragmented views and data silos [27]. A unified observability platform can address this by aggregating data - whether it’s from AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, or on-premises Kubernetes clusters - into a single, cohesive interface. This centralised approach ensures that logs, metrics, traces, and events follow a consistent format, making it easier to monitor and manage the entire infrastructure.

Using industry-standard protocols and APIs adds another layer of efficiency. Tools like OpenTelemetry offer vendor-neutral solutions, helping organisations avoid being tied to specific providers while maintaining data portability. Additionally, Kubernetes metadata and consistent labelling (e.g., app, role, environment) make it easier to organise metrics and alerts [28]. Comprehensive monitoring, from the cluster and node levels down to pods, containers, and application metrics, ensures no blind spots in complex environments. Standardisation is key to deploying observability tools seamlessly across all clusters.

Automating Observability Agents and Exporters

Automation is a game-changer for observability. By automating the deployment of observability tools, organisations can reduce manual overhead, minimise errors, and maintain consistency.

Kubernetes operators like the OpenTelemetry Operator and Intel's RMD Operator simplify the deployment and management of observability agents and exporters across clusters [30][31]. Tools like Flux CD and Argo CD, which follow GitOps principles, further streamline this process. Changes to observability configurations stored in Git repositories are automatically applied to all relevant clusters, ensuring consistency and providing audit trails for accountability.

Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) tools like Terraform also play a critical role. By treating infrastructure and application deployment as code, organisations can automate processes with reusable templates and enforce policies. This approach, when combined with GitOps workflows, ensures traceable and consistent updates [29]. Centralised tools like Sveltos provide a unified interface for managing observability components, making it easier to maintain configurations across clusters. Standardised templates ensure that new clusters automatically inherit the existing setup, preventing environment drift [29].

Working with Expert Consultants for Observability Strategy

Even with standardisation and automation in place, expert guidance is sometimes necessary. External consultants bring specialised knowledge to help organisations optimise their observability strategies. They can identify vulnerabilities, tailor solutions to specific needs, and align observability efforts with operational and business goals [33].

Consultants offer a multi-faceted approach, combining strategic recommendations with actionable plans. They design observability frameworks that adapt to evolving cloud workloads, ensuring resilience and compliance with regulatory requirements [33]. Their expertise in areas like real-time monitoring, threat intelligence, and automated response can significantly enhance both security and operational efficiency.

For instance, Hokstad Consulting focuses on optimising DevOps practices, cloud infrastructure, and costs for businesses in hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Their services include strategic cloud migration, custom automation, and cost engineering, all aimed at improving observability while reducing expenses and improving deployment cycles.

Alternatively, DevOps as a Service provides a scalable solution for organisations lacking internal expertise. Instead of investing heavily in training on complex observability tools, businesses can rely on external experts to deploy and maintain robust monitoring systems. This approach ensures that observability strategies remain effective as requirements evolve [32][33].

Conclusion

Key Takeaways

Achieving effective observability in multi-cluster Kubernetes CI/CD environments requires a seamless integration of logs, metrics, and traces [3]. Centralised logging systems, paired with comprehensive metrics collection across deployments and services, serve as the backbone of this approach.

Comprehensive Kubernetes observability requires integrating logs, metrics, and traces. Set up centralized logging, collect key metrics from your deployments, and use tracing to understand request flow. Correlating these three data sources is crucial for effective troubleshooting and performance analysis. [3]

Automation tools like Kubernetes Operators, GitOps, and Infrastructure-as-Code play a critical role in ensuring consistent deployment of observability agents while minimising errors. This is especially important for the 56% of organisations managing over 10 clusters across multiple cloud environments [1].

To manage costs without sacrificing insights, it's essential to implement data retention policies, adopt lightweight data collection methods, and regularly review configurations [2][3]. The focus should be on setting clear objectives for observability efforts to prioritise useful data and eliminate unnecessary noise.

Security is another cornerstone - encrypting data, enforcing strict access controls, and adhering to regulatory requirements are non-negotiable in hybrid and multi-cloud setups [3].

These practices lay a solid technical foundation that not only enhances operational efficiency but also supports broader business goals.

How Observability Drives Business Success

Beyond the technical improvements, observability has a direct and measurable impact on business outcomes. Organisations that embrace centralised observability report significant benefits. For instance, 79% of companies with centralised observability systems see major time and cost savings, transforming observability into a key driver of growth [35]. It also addresses critical customer satisfaction challenges, with 53% of respondents noting that application issues have previously led to customer or revenue losses [34].

We reduced downtime by 30% and accelerated feature delivery by 15%. Centralized observability didn't just save time and money - it became a strategic enabler for growth. – VP at a software and technology company with 5,000+ employees [35]

The ability to deploy updates faster provides a competitive edge. When development teams can swiftly identify and fix issues through robust observability practices, they spend less time resolving problems and more time focusing on innovation. This shift allows organisations to deliver greater value to their customers.

In a world where 89% of enterprises rely on multiple cloud providers [32], observability ensures unified visibility across platforms. This clarity optimises resource use, improves system health, and reduces the risk of expensive downtime.

Context is key. Observability isn't valuable until the data is translated into a story or process that aligns with business needs. Partnerships with the business are essential for achieving this. – Olin Gay, Director, Head of Observability, BlackRock [35]

Collaborating with experts like Hokstad Consulting can accelerate the adoption of observability strategies tailored to align technical performance with business objectives. Their expertise in areas like DevOps transformation, cloud cost optimisation, and custom automation helps businesses achieve long-term success through improved reliability, reduced costs, and enhanced customer satisfaction.

FAQs