Ultimate Guide to Cloud Budgeting 2025 | Hokstad Consulting

Ultimate Guide to Cloud Budgeting 2025

Ultimate Guide to Cloud Budgeting 2025

Cloud budgeting in 2025 is all about managing fluctuating cloud expenses effectively while maximising resource efficiency. With UK businesses allocating over 50% of their tech budgets to cloud services, controlling costs is critical as 32% of cloud budgets are wasted annually. Here's what you need to know:

  • The Challenge: Cloud operates on an OPEX model, making costs unpredictable. 42% of CIOs and CTOs cite cloud waste as their top issue.
  • Key Strategies: Accurate forecasting, setting budget limits, regular audits, and effective resource tagging are essential for cost control.
  • Tools: Native tools (e.g., AWS Cost Explorer) are cost-effective for single-cloud setups, while third-party solutions like Cloudability excel in multi-cloud environments.
  • Multi-Cloud Management: Unified platforms simplify cost tracking across providers like AWS and Azure, reducing waste and improving compliance.
  • DevOps Role: Embedding cost awareness into CI/CD pipelines and automating infrastructure provisioning can cut costs significantly.

Cloud budgeting isn't just about saving money - it's about ensuring financial clarity, enabling innovation, and staying competitive in a fast-paced digital landscape.

Top 6 AWS Cost Optimization Strategies You Need in 2025 | Save Big on Amazon Web Services

Key Strategies for Cloud Budgeting

Managing cloud budgets effectively requires more than just keeping an eye on expenses. A staggering 80% of organisations exceed their cloud budgets [4]. To address this, UK businesses need a structured approach that combines accurate forecasting, proactive cost controls, and efficient resource management.

Forecasting and Tracking Cloud Costs

Forecasting cloud expenses is the cornerstone of effective budget management. Unlike traditional IT budgeting, cloud forecasting involves analysing past usage trends while factoring in future business needs and growth plans. This method allows organisations to predict costs more accurately and make well-informed decisions. Different workloads call for different forecasting methods [3]:

  • Simple forecasting works well for stable workloads with consistent usage.
  • Trend-based forecasting suits organisations experiencing gradual growth.
  • Driver-based forecasting is ideal for fluctuating demands, linking costs to specific business drivers.
  • Net new workload forecasting helps estimate expenses for new projects or deployments.

Artificial intelligence has taken forecasting to the next level. AI-driven tools can analyse historical data, identify patterns, and generate more precise cost predictions. Research shows that AI can reduce forecasting errors by as much as 30% [4].

To ensure accurate forecasting, it's vital to collect data from all cloud platforms, not just the primary provider [4]. Regular reviews and adjustments are equally important. Monthly validation of forecasts with input from finance, engineering, and operations teams ensures that the technical and business objectives align seamlessly.

These forecasting practices set the stage for defining budget limits and implementing necessary controls.

Setting Budget Limits and Controls

Budget limits and controls are essential for avoiding unexpected cost surges. With 58% of companies encountering unforeseen cost increases and nearly half of cloud-based businesses struggling to manage expenses [4][2], robust controls are no longer optional.

A good starting point is setting up automated alerts for budget overruns or anomalies. These alerts should operate at multiple levels - project, department, and organisation-wide - ensuring the right people are notified promptly. The key is to set thresholds that provide early warnings without overwhelming teams with unnecessary alerts.

Spending caps are another critical tool. These can be applied at various levels, from individual teams to specific projects. While cloud providers offer built-in tools for setting caps, third-party solutions often provide more advanced capabilities, such as enforcing policies across multiple platforms [1].

In addition to alerts and caps, organisations should establish policies to control resource usage. For instance, they can restrict expensive configurations, limit provisioning to approved instance types, or require approval workflows for high-cost resources. These measures help prevent costly errors while maintaining operational flexibility.

Clear communication is vital. Teams need to understand their budget responsibilities to quickly spot overspending and take corrective actions before costs spiral out of control [7].

Regular Audits and Resource Tagging

To complement budget controls, regular audits and effective tagging are crucial for maintaining cost visibility and accountability. Without proper tagging, it’s challenging to track where money is being spent - a problem that leaves only 30% of organisations with a clear understanding of their cloud expenses [5].

An organisation-wide tagging strategy ensures consistency. Tags should include details such as the resource owner, project name, environment (e.g., development, staging, production), cost centre, and business purpose. This multi-dimensional approach simplifies cost tracking and highlights areas for optimisation.

Monthly audits are essential to identify unused or underutilised resources. Automated tools can enhance this process by flagging idle instances, oversized resources, and orphaned storage volumes. Collaboration between technical teams, who understand resource usage, and finance teams, who assess the business impact, makes audits more effective.

Audits should also analyse spending patterns to uncover trends and anomalies. Regular reviews enable organisations to address cost issues proactively rather than reacting after the fact.

Involving IT, finance, and business stakeholders fosters a culture of transparency and shared responsibility. This ensures that optimisation decisions are both technically sound and aligned with business goals [5].

Tools and Platforms for Cloud Cost Management

Managing cloud budgets without the right tools can quickly result in financial chaos, as unchecked spending spirals out of control [8][9]. Today’s tools are designed to tackle this issue, offering solutions that not only optimise architecture but also help engineers uncover ways to cut costs [8][9].

Given the challenges of managing cloud expenses, choosing the right tool is essential for keeping budgets in check.

Comparing Cloud Cost Management Tools

Cloud cost management tools generally fall into three categories, each suited to different needs and budgets:

  • Native tools: Options like AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management, and Google Cloud Billing Reports are great for single-cloud environments. They provide basic tracking and real-time data at a low cost but often lack the advanced features needed for multi-cloud setups.

  • Third-party solutions: Tools such as CloudZero, ManageEngine CloudSpend, and Apptio Cloudability excel in multi-cloud environments. They offer advanced analytics, automation, and detailed reporting, making them ideal for larger organisations. However, these features come at a higher price.

  • Open-source tools: Platforms like Kubecost and Infracost cater to teams with technical expertise and limited budgets. These tools offer customisation and transparency but require significant effort for setup and ongoing maintenance.

Here’s a quick comparison of how some leading platforms perform:

Platform Scalability Security & Compliance Reporting & Monitoring Price Customer Support Overall Rating
Umbrella 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.9
Zesty 4.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.4
Densify 4.0 3.5 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.3
Cloudability 4.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.3
VMware Aria CloudHealth 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.2
Datadog 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.2

Elisha Ben Zvi, VP of R&D at Umbrella, stresses the importance of proper implementation:

Ensure resources are consistently tagged and maintained. Proper tagging improves cost tracking by project, team, or environment, allowing for more granular cost insights. [9]

He also emphasises the value of real-time monitoring:

Set up alerts for cost anomalies in real-time to avoid bill shocks. Instant alerts can help catch unexpected spikes in usage before they become major expenses. [9]

For UK businesses, priorities should include real-time cost monitoring, cost allocation features, AI-driven insights, and multi-cloud compatibility. Tools must also integrate seamlessly with existing systems and comply with UK regulations like GDPR and data residency requirements.

Multi-Cloud Cost Management Platforms

As more organisations adopt multi-cloud strategies - 89% of companies were using a multi-cloud approach in 2023 - specialised platforms have become essential for maintaining control over diverse cloud environments [9]. These tools simplify expense tracking across providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, offering consolidated visibility and better budget management.

One of their key benefits is centralised reporting, which provides a unified view of expenses and simplifies cost comparisons across providers. They also automate the management of discounts, such as Reserved Instances and Savings Plans, ensuring businesses maximise their savings without manual oversight.

The FinOps Foundation’s 2025 State of FinOps Report highlights the importance of these tools, noting that over 50% of respondents prioritise workload optimisation and waste reduction [11]. Multi-cloud platforms address this by offering vendor-neutral insights to help businesses choose cost-effective placements for workloads.

A 2024 survey by Stacklet revealed that 51% of respondents waste more than 40% of their cloud spend [10]. Multi-cloud platforms combat this waste by scaling resources to match workload demands, preventing over-provisioning and under-provisioning.

For UK businesses, these platforms are particularly useful for streamlining compliance reporting. They consolidate cost data into flexible formats that meet regulatory and governance requirements, making it easier to navigate complex rules around data residency and compliance frameworks.

Modern platforms also enhance engineering efficiency. Features like tagging, showback, and chargeback ensure costs are accurately tracked and allocated across teams. By automating resource allocation and monitoring performance, they help businesses achieve better cost efficiency.

Collaboration across finance, engineering, and IT teams is key to driving cost management efforts [9]. Cloud providers are also working to simplify multi-cloud cost tracking through initiatives like FinOps FOCUS, which aims to standardise cost data formats. This will make it even easier for UK businesses to manage and analyse multi-cloud expenses effectively.

Need help optimizing your cloud costs?

Get expert advice on how to reduce your cloud expenses without sacrificing performance.

Budgeting for Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Environments

Managing costs in multi-cloud and hybrid setups demands more than just advanced tools - it requires tailored strategies to streamline data and improve efficiency. With 80% of organisations now using multiple public or private clouds[2] and over 76% expected to adopt multi-cloud setups by 2025[13], the complexity of tracking and controlling expenses has grown significantly. Traditional single-cloud budgeting approaches often fall short, leading to waste and uncertainty. To address this, businesses need strategies that go beyond basic forecasting and budget control.

Managing Costs Across Multiple Cloud Providers

Multi-cloud environments introduce unique challenges, particularly when it comes to cost visibility. Each provider - whether it's AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud - has its own pricing models, billing cycles, and cost structures, which can create gaps in oversight. Unified monitoring platforms are a game-changer here, merging cost data from multiple providers into a single dashboard. This eliminates the need for manual reconciliation of billing formats and provides real-time insights into overall cloud spending.

A unified approach also enables smarter workload placement. For instance, businesses can allocate compute-intensive tasks to providers with better CPU/GPU pricing, while storage-heavy operations can be moved to regions offering lower costs[12]. Standardised policies - such as spending limits, approval workflows, and consistent resource tagging - help prevent over-provisioning, while colocating storage and compute resources reduces unnecessary egress fees[12].

Automation further simplifies governance by handling compliance checks, usage reporting, and security scans across environments[12]. Tools like Docker and Kubernetes make it easier to move applications between clouds, allowing businesses to shift workloads based on cost considerations without compromising flexibility.

For UK organisations, this flexibility is especially valuable. It allows them to balance regulatory requirements, such as GDPR compliance, with cost optimisation. Provider strengths also play a role: Google Cloud is often chosen for AI and machine learning projects, AWS for its global reach and mature services, and Azure for its seamless integration with Microsoft enterprise tools[12]. These strategies pave the way for comparing deployment models and finding the right balance for specific needs.

Public, Private, and Hybrid Cloud Cost Comparison

Each cloud deployment model comes with its own cost dynamics:

Deployment Model Initial Investment Operational Costs Scalability Compliance Control Cost Predictability
Public Cloud Very Low Variable (usage-based) Excellent Limited Low
Private Cloud High High (fixed cost) Limited Excellent High
Hybrid Cloud Medium Mixed (fixed + variable) Good Good Medium

Public clouds are attractive for their low upfront costs and scalable, pay-as-you-go pricing. They provide instant access to global infrastructure, making them ideal for less-sensitive workloads. On the other hand, private clouds require a higher initial investment but offer predictable costs, making them a go-to option for regulated or sensitive data. Hybrid clouds strike a balance, using public clouds for general tasks while reserving private clouds for critical operations. This approach reduces infrastructure costs and avoids over-provisioning[14].

Hybrid setups also excel in scalability, allowing businesses to tap into public cloud resources during peak demand while keeping essential workloads on private clouds[14]. By maintaining sensitive data within private environments, organisations can meet regulatory requirements and enhance security[14]. Additionally, distributing workloads between public and private clouds improves redundancy and disaster recovery, minimising downtime and financial losses during service disruptions[14].

To budget effectively in hybrid environments, businesses need clear policies and defined roles for resource ownership, cost accountability, and lifecycle management. AI and machine learning tools can be integrated to analyse workloads and predict resource needs, enabling proactive cost management[14].

As we look ahead to 2025, multi-cloud and hybrid strategies will become indispensable for balancing cost, performance, and compliance. For UK businesses, adopting comprehensive budgeting practices will not only provide better visibility and control over cloud expenses but also ensure they remain agile in an ever-changing digital landscape.

DevOps and Cloud Cost Engineering

The growing emphasis on proactive cloud budgeting has placed DevOps and cloud cost engineering at the forefront of modern UK cloud management. With 58% of organisations surpassing their expected cloud budgets [15], the old habit of treating cost optimisation as an afterthought no longer works. Today, DevOps teams are integrating cost-awareness into their workflows, treating financial accountability as equally important as performance and reliability.

Cloud cost engineering combines financial insight with technical know-how, encouraging collaboration between finance and engineering teams to manage cloud spending effectively [18]. Instead of reacting to overspending after the fact, this approach embeds cost management into the development process. By incorporating cost-saving measures directly into their workflows [17], DevOps engineers create systems that automatically balance performance goals with budgetary limits, laying the groundwork for automation strategies that are both efficient and cost-effective.

Using DevOps Automation to Reduce Costs

DevOps automation has become a powerful tool for managing cloud costs while maintaining operational standards. The shift involves moving from traditional DevOps practices - focused on speed and reliability - to a model that includes cost monitoring, resource efficiency, and automation [15].

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is central to this approach. Instead of keeping resources running continuously, IaC allows teams to provision infrastructure on demand, significantly reducing idle costs [15]. Tools like Terraform can create temporary environments for development or testing that automatically terminate when no longer needed, eliminating waste.

Here's how optimised practices compare to traditional methods:

Feature Current Optimised
Infrastructure Provisioning Always-on VMs & instances On-demand, auto-scaling resources
Scaling Approach Static capacity planning Dynamic auto-scaling
CI/CD Environments Persistent environments Ephemeral, self-destructing test environments
Cost Monitoring Reactive cost analysis Proactive cost visibility & alerts
Compute Optimisation Manual tuning Automated rightsizing & Spot Instances

Integrating cost visibility into CI/CD pipelines allows teams to evaluate the financial impact of infrastructure changes [6]. Establishing a consistent tagging strategy across resources also ensures clear and ongoing cost tracking [18].

Cost optimisation in DevOps is about more than cutting expenses - it's about making smart, scalable choices. By leveraging automation, right-sizing resources, and monitoring usage in real time, teams can stay agile without overspending. Efficient cloud management is key to sustainable growth in a DevOps-driven world.

Additional cost-saving measures include automating build reviews, streamlining testing processes, and removing outdated artefacts to reduce storage expenses [17].

Hokstad Consulting's Cloud Cost Optimisation Services

Hokstad Consulting

Hokstad Consulting has positioned itself as a leader in helping businesses reduce cloud costs while enhancing efficiency. Their expertise lies in combining DevOps practices with cost engineering to deliver savings of 30–50%, all while improving deployment timelines and system reliability.

At the core of Hokstad's approach is DevOps transformation. By implementing automated CI/CD pipelines and monitoring tools, they integrate cost-awareness into every phase of development. This includes setting up temporary testing environments, automating resource scaling, and deploying dashboards that provide real-time spending insights.

Their cloud migration services ensure businesses transition to the cloud with cost efficiency built in. Using a zero-downtime migration strategy, Hokstad incorporates detailed cost modelling, resource right-sizing, and automated cost controls to prevent budget overruns both during and after migration.

Hokstad also conducts cloud cost audits, offering a thorough review of current spending. These audits identify underutilised resources, suggest immediate savings opportunities, and recommend automation strategies. They also evaluate options like reserved instances and savings plans, noting that 40% of companies miss out on committed use discounts [16].

For businesses with unique cost challenges, Hokstad provides custom development and automation services, such as bespoke monitoring tools and tailored cost allocation systems.

Their No Savings, No Fee model reflects their confidence in delivering measurable results. Additionally, their retainer services offer ongoing support, including performance reviews, cost trend analysis, and proactive updates as cloud services evolve.

For UK organisations navigating the complexities of cloud cost management in 2025, Hokstad Consulting offers a comprehensive solution. Their blend of DevOps expertise and cost engineering ensures both immediate savings and a sustainable financial approach to cloud operations.

Conclusion

In 2025, the global cloud computing market hit an impressive £912.77 billion. Despite 67% of CIOs prioritising cloud cost optimisation, 32% of budgets are still wasted, and 6 in 10 organisations report unexpected cost spikes [21][2].

Shifting from reactive cost management to proactive budgeting is about more than cutting expenses - it’s about driving growth. Take Airbnb, for example, which saved £63.5 million by improving storage services [19]. Similarly, WPP reduced annual costs by 30% through a well-planned FinOps strategy [19]. These examples prove that embracing smarter cloud budgeting can lead to tangible results.

Key Points for Businesses in 2025

To manage cloud costs effectively, businesses need clear visibility and accountability. Alarmingly, 7 in 10 companies are unsure how their cloud spending is allocated [2]. Tools like chargeback or showback models are becoming essential [19].

FinOps practices are now central to managing cloud finances. By bringing together operations, finance, and engineering teams, FinOps ensures shared accountability. Deloitte estimates that adopting FinOps could save companies £21 billion in 2025, with potential cost reductions of up to 40% [19].

Automation through DevOps also plays a critical role. Embedding cost awareness into development workflows - using tools like Infrastructure as Code (IaC), automated scaling, and ephemeral environments - helps teams avoid unnecessary spending while maintaining performance.

For businesses adopting multi-cloud or hybrid strategies, managing costs is even more complex. With SMBs expected to allocate over 50% of their tech budgets to cloud services in 2025 [2], developing frameworks for cross-platform visibility is crucial.

Next Steps for Better Cloud Budgets

To refine your cloud budgeting, start by addressing waste and clarifying ownership of costs. Begin with an honest review of your current approach: evaluate your tagging system, set up alerts, and define key performance indicators [19]. Align your cloud resources with actual business needs to improve visibility [19].

Eliminating waste should be a top priority. With 75% of organisations reporting increased cloud waste [2], identifying idle or underutilised resources for right-sizing or removal can deliver quick savings. For instance, Sky Group discovered it had burned through a year’s cloud budget in just six months. By implementing FinOps tools, they saved £1.5 million initially and £3.8 million the following year [19].

Advanced monitoring tools and unified dashboards can further streamline cost management, making it easier to track and optimise spending.

For organisations struggling with the complexity of cloud environments, expert guidance is key. Currently, half of cloud users have dedicated FinOps teams, and another 20% plan to establish one within the next year [19]. For those without in-house expertise, partnering with specialists can make all the difference.

Growth is now the top thing on CEOs' minds. – John-David Lovelock, VP Analyst, Gartner [20]

Cloud budgeting is no longer just about saving money - it’s a strategic tool for growth. Businesses that master it can scale efficiently, invest in innovation, and stay ahead of the competition.

For UK organisations looking to take control of their cloud costs, proven strategies, advanced tools, and expert advice are essential. To explore tailored solutions, visit Hokstad Consulting for personalised cloud cost optimisation services.

FAQs

How can businesses in the UK accurately plan cloud budgets and avoid overspending in 2025?

To keep cloud budgets in check and avoid overspending in 2025, UK businesses should focus on active cost management and take advantage of modern budgeting and forecasting tools. Here’s how:

  • Keep a close eye on costs: Regularly track cloud expenses to spot patterns and address potential overspending before it becomes a problem.
  • Leverage predictive analytics: Use advanced tools to estimate future cloud usage and related costs more accurately.
  • Set up cost controls: Introduce measures like spending limits and automated alerts to help stick to your budget.

Real-time dashboards and automated reporting tools can also be game-changers, offering clear insights into where your money is going. By adopting these approaches, businesses can maintain better financial control and avoid unpleasant budget surprises, ensuring smoother operations.

What are the best practices for managing costs across multiple cloud platforms in 2025?

To keep cloud costs under control across various platforms in 2025, start by prioritising clear visibility into all your cloud environments. Use centralised monitoring tools to get a comprehensive view of your resources. Establish consistent tagging standards to keep track of assets, making it easier to pinpoint unused or underutilised resources. Regular cost audits are also essential for analysing spending patterns and spotting areas where savings can be made.

Integrating automation into tasks like scaling and resource allocation can help optimise usage while cutting down on waste. It’s also worth focusing on right-sizing resources - aligning your cloud capacity with actual needs to avoid overprovisioning. These steps can help businesses maintain better financial oversight, enhance transparency, and stay flexible as pricing models evolve.

How can DevOps teams incorporate cost awareness into their workflows to improve cloud budgeting?

DevOps teams can improve cloud budgeting by weaving cost awareness into every step of their processes. This means keeping a close eye on cloud usage, automating ways to optimise spending, and maintaining clear visibility into where the money is going.

Embracing FinOps practices is a smart move. These include gaining better insights into cloud expenses, setting defined budgets, and adjusting resources to fit actual needs. Simple adjustments, like scheduling non-critical tasks during quieter periods or automating resource scaling, can help trim costs without sacrificing performance or efficiency.

By adopting these methods, DevOps teams can strike a balance between meeting operational demands and keeping cloud spending under control, all while ensuring resources are used wisely.