Cloud Cost Compliance Trends in 2025

Managing cloud costs while staying compliant is now a top priority for UK businesses. Here’s why it matters and what’s shaping the landscape in 2025:

• Cloud reliance is growing: 96% of businesses use cloud services, with enterprise IT budgets shifting heavily towards cloud technologies.
• Cost challenges: 32% of cloud budgets are wasted, and 84% of organisations struggle to control spending.
• Regulatory pressures: New rules like the UK Data Act and EU AI Act demand stricter compliance, especially in sectors like finance and healthcare.
• Key trends: Multi-cloud strategies, AI/ML workloads, and FinOps practices are reshaping how organisations manage costs and compliance.
• Tools and strategies: Native cloud tools (e.g., AWS Cost Explorer) and third-party platforms (e.g., CloudHealth) are helping businesses improve visibility and control.

Without proper systems in place, businesses risk financial strain and regulatory penalties. The rise of FinOps, automation, and frameworks like ISO/IEC 27001 are providing solutions to these challenges.

For UK organisations, balancing cost efficiency with compliance is more important than ever.

State of AWS RI/SP in 2025: Are You Compliant with the Latest Policy Changes?

What Drives Cloud Cost Compliance in 2025

Three major factors are pushing UK organisations to prioritise cloud cost compliance in 2025. These include rising financial pressures, increasingly complex regulations, and operational hurdles that demand immediate solutions.

Rising Cloud Costs and Multi-Cloud Complexities

Cloud expenses are becoming a significant burden for UK businesses. A staggering 84% of organisations struggle to control these costs, with many overshooting their budgets by an average of 17% [4]. Lack of visibility only makes things worse - 66% of engineers and 56% of finance professionals report that limited insight into cloud costs disrupts their operations. Alarmingly, 7 out of 10 companies are uncertain about how much they’re actually spending on the cloud [4][3].

While multi-cloud strategies offer flexibility and resilience, they’ve also made cost management far more complicated. About 42% of CIOs and CTOs cite cloud waste as their top challenge in 2025. Managing resources across different platforms often creates blind spots, and untagged resources are a major culprit, with organisations wasting an average of 30% of their cloud budgets on improperly tagged items [4].

Only 23% of companies manage to keep cloud cost variances below 5%. Adding to the problem is a skills gap in cloud financial management. This lack of expertise creates a vicious cycle: poor visibility leads to waste, which then limits resources that could have been invested in better cost-management practices. Combined with the weight of regulatory demands, these financial strains are becoming harder to navigate.

Navigating Regulatory and Data Sovereignty Challenges

As financial pressures grow, evolving data regulations add another layer of complexity. The UK’s Data (Use and Access) Act has introduced new data protection requirements, forcing businesses to revise their data processing systems and policies [6]. These changes often mean higher cloud resource needs, stronger security measures, and more rigorous compliance monitoring.

Data sovereignty has become a major concern for IT leaders in the UK. Surveys reveal that 83% of IT leaders are worried about how international developments could impact data sovereignty, while 61% now see it as a strategic priority [7]. Yet, only 35% of organisations have a full understanding of where their data is hosted, which poses significant compliance risks. Under GDPR, fines can reach up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover - a risk no business can afford to ignore [9].

Recent findings confirm that data sovereignty is now fundamental - UK businesses must ensure clear control over data host locations to mitigate significant GDPR risks – Civo [7]

UK organisations also face the challenge of complying with both EU and UK-specific regulations when handling data from EU citizens. Around 85% of IT leaders have identified multi-jurisdictional regulatory compliance as a critical issue [7].

Recent changes to the ePrivacy regime have increased financial risks even further, with fines now mirroring those under UK GDPR - up to £17.5 million or 4% of global turnover [10]. Additionally, amendments under the Data (Use and Access) Act, such as mandatory complaints procedures and expanded enforcement powers for the Information Commissioner, mean businesses must allocate more resources to compliance audits and data-related inquiries.

The Role of FinOps

FinOps, a framework that aligns finance and IT teams, has emerged as a powerful tool to tackle cloud costs. By fostering collaboration, it can reduce cloud expenses by 30–50% while addressing skills gaps and ensuring compliance [11][5]. With 67% of organisations expecting cloud costs to rise in the coming year - and 82% yet to implement strategies to track the ROI of AI projects [5] - proactive cost management is no longer optional.

The FinOps approach brings together finance, operations, and development teams to embed compliance considerations into cloud spending decisions from the start. This is especially important as 68% of organisations report cutting spending in other areas due to escalating cloud costs [5]. By adopting FinOps, businesses can lay the groundwork for the compliance frameworks explored in later sections.

Cloud Cost Compliance Frameworks That Work

UK organisations are juggling rising costs and increasingly stringent regulations. To address these challenges, two key approaches have proven effective: the FinOps Framework, which improves operational efficiency, and established security standards like CIS Controls and ISO/IEC 27001, which strengthen governance.

FinOps Framework

By 2025, the FinOps Framework has evolved to meet the needs of a 'Cloud+' era. According to the FinOps Foundation, FinOps is an operational and cultural practice that maximises cloud value, fosters data-driven decisions, and builds financial accountability across engineering, finance, and business teams [14]. It provides a flexible structure, shaped by real-world experiences, to help organisations develop a successful FinOps strategy [13].

The 2025 update introduces Scopes, expanding its reach beyond IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) to include AI, software licences, and other variable costs [12]. The framework is built around three core phases:

• Inform: Gain visibility into cloud spending patterns.
• Optimise: Identify and implement cost-saving measures without compromising performance.
• Operate: Embed these practices into daily workflows for sustainable cost management.

Organisations adopting FinOps have reported cost reductions of up to 60% when fully optimised [15]. This approach also tackles inefficiencies, such as the estimated one-third of cloud spending wasted on underutilised resources [18]. FinOps helps establish clear policies for managing financial risks, ensuring cloud investments align with business and regulatory priorities. For UK organisations, particularly those navigating complex compliance landscapes, FinOps offers the adaptability to scale swiftly and meet real-time regulatory demands, including GDPR audits [14].

Traditional security standards further enhance the FinOps framework by formalising governance and risk management practices.

CIS Controls and ISO/IEC 27001

These established frameworks complement FinOps by providing rigorous, certification-backed governance for organisations in regulated industries or those pursuing formal certifications. ISO/IEC 27001, for instance, is widely recognised, with over 70,000 certificates issued across 150 countries [16]. It promotes a comprehensive approach to information security by integrating people, policies, and technology. In the context of cloud cost compliance, ISO/IEC 27001 encourages organisations to proactively address vulnerabilities and become more risk-aware in their cost management processes.

CIS Controls, on the other hand, focus on practical security measures that reduce the risk of compliance violations and data breaches while maintaining cost efficiency [16]. These controls are particularly useful for UK businesses striving to meet GDPR and domestic data protection requirements. By mapping CIS Controls alongside ISO/IEC 27001, organisations can create a cohesive strategy that addresses both operational security and formal compliance needs. Regularly reviewing and updating these mappings ensures alignment with evolving regulatory expectations [17].

For UK businesses managing cloud costs under GDPR and other local data protection laws, these frameworks provide a structured way to define policies for cloud resource usage, procurement, and financial oversight [14]. Together, the FinOps Framework and standards like ISO/IEC 27001 and CIS Controls offer a strong foundation for immediate cost management and long-term regulatory compliance in 2025.

Tools for Cloud Cost Compliance

Managing cloud costs effectively requires the right tools to track expenses, monitor usage, and ensure compliance with regulations. In the UK, organisations often rely on either native cloud tools that integrate directly with specific platforms or third-party solutions that offer a broader, multi-cloud perspective.

Cloud Provider Tools

Native tools provided by cloud platforms are designed to work seamlessly within their ecosystems and are often included at no extra cost. For example:

• AWS Cost Explorer: Offers detailed spending analysis and forecasting capabilities.
• Azure Cost Management: Provides budgeting controls and cost allocation features.
• Google Cloud Platform's Billing Reports: Includes granular usage tracking and automated alerts for spending thresholds.

These tools automatically gather usage data, provide real-time insights, and support basic compliance reporting. However, their scope is typically limited to a single provider, which can be a drawback for organisations managing multiple cloud environments.

Third-Party Compliance Platforms

Third-party platforms go beyond the limitations of native tools by aggregating data across multiple providers, offering a unified view of cloud usage and costs. Popular options include CloudHealth by VMware and Cloudability by Apptio [19].

• CloudHealth collects data from cloud, on-premises, and hybrid systems, while also incorporating identity and access management (IAM) features. This makes it a strong choice for large enterprises with complex, multi-cloud setups.
• Cloudability delivers cost analytics and integrates with major providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, ensuring quick deployment with minimal configuration. It has helped organisations achieve notable results, such as reducing cloud unit costs by 30% and increasing commitment coverage to over 90% [20].

IBM Cloudability has helped American on the FinOps journey by providing the visibility and spend details that app owners and engineers need to make quality business decisions, such as architecture, right sizing, performance and future investments. – American Airlines [20]

Real-world examples highlight the impact of these tools:

• Sportradar reduced transaction costs by 90% using IBM Cloudability.
• Coles improved cost transparency across 170 teams and 100 Azure subscriptions.
• Securian Financial saved approximately £160,000 annually by optimising their VPC deployment [20].

Comparing Native Tools and Third-Party Platforms

Here’s a quick comparison to showcase the differences:

Pricing structures for third-party platforms can vary. For instance, Cloudability offers custom contracts starting at £24,000 annually for up to £800,000 in managed cloud spend, while CloudHealth often uses a dynamic monthly billing model combining base fees and usage thresholds [19][21].

Emerging Tools for Automation

Newer platforms like nOps bring specialised automation features, such as commitment management with a 100% utilisation guarantee. By leveraging machine learning, nOps tracks real-time Spot market pricing and interruption trends, offering additional cost-saving opportunities for UK organisations handling variable workloads [22].

When choosing cloud cost compliance tools, it’s critical to look for features like real-time visibility, automated remediation, audit trails, and smooth integration with existing systems [23]. For UK businesses navigating complex regulations, tools that can generate detailed compliance reports and maintain logs are essential for meeting GDPR and other data protection standards.

For expert advice on integrating these tools into your operations, consider reaching out to Hokstad Consulting.

Cloud Cost Compliance Best Practices

Managing cloud cost compliance effectively isn’t just about having the right tools - it's also about creating structured processes that can evolve alongside business needs while staying aligned with regulatory standards. In the UK, more organisations are adopting automated solutions to minimise manual oversight and seamlessly integrate compliance into their daily operations.

Automated Policy Management

Governance-as-Code (GaC) has become a key strategy for handling cloud cost compliance policies in 2025. Unlike traditional manual methods, GaC treats policies as code, enabling automation, repeatability, and version control across cloud environments [25]. This approach ensures consistency and makes audits more straightforward.

Take the example of a mid-sized SaaS company: they implemented Rego-based policies to enforce mandatory cost centre tags, limit instance sizes, and restrict specific services in non-production environments. By integrating Open Policy Agent (OPA) into their deployment pipelines via GitHub Actions and setting up daily compliance scans with Grafana dashboards, they achieved a 20% reduction in monthly cloud expenses, along with improved accountability and audit readiness [25].

To streamline enforcement, UK organisations should focus on defining cost governance policies using policy-as-code languages like Rego (for OPA) or Sentinel (for HashiCorp tools). These policies can be enforced at various stages - pre-deployment, during runtime, and within CI/CD pipelines [24][25]. Auto-remediation features can tag missing resources or terminate non-compliant instances automatically, while real-time alerts help detect budget anomalies and prevent unexpected costs [26]. Regular monitoring complements these automated policies by uncovering additional optimisation opportunities.

Regular Monitoring and Benchmarking

Continuous monitoring is at the heart of effective cloud cost compliance. Regular audits and variance analyses help organisations stay compliant while identifying areas for cost savings. For instance, addressing over-allocated instances can cut cloud costs by 15 to 25% [30]. A great example is Harper James Solicitors, a UK-based legal firm, which reduced its monthly Azure spend by 31% in Q2 2023 after an audit revealed charges for unused virtual machines, oversized storage tiers, and unnecessary add-ons [2].

Monthly reviews of spending trends and quarterly evaluations of policy effectiveness can further support cost efficiency. Consistent resource tagging - whether by department, team, or project - makes cost allocation more precise and helps identify compliance gaps. Automated spending alerts also act as early warning systems to avoid budget overruns. Together, these practices ensure that cloud cost management remains both efficient and compliant.

Adding Compliance to DevOps Workflows

Beyond automated management and monitoring, embedding compliance into DevOps processes ensures governance at every stage. By integrating compliance checks into CI/CD pipelines, organisations can align every change with regulatory controls [27]. Automating security processes throughout the software development lifecycle reduces human error, vulnerabilities, and downtime [29]. Regular vulnerability assessments further strengthen this approach by identifying risks before deployment.

Using Infrastructure as Code (IaC) creates consistent, replicable environments where every change is logged with a detailed version history [27][29]. Companies like Airbnb and Lyft have seen substantial savings through such practices - Airbnb reduced storage costs by 27%, while Lyft achieved a 40% cost reduction in six months using AWS Cost Management solutions [28].

When DevOps practices are aligned with SOC 2 standards, you ensure that each step in your pipeline reinforces security and accountability. – Max Edwards, Author, ISMS.online [27]

To ensure successful integration, organisations should establish dedicated compliance teams to assess risks and maintain precise control mappings across workflows. Standardising tools and processes reduces variability and manual effort, while advanced reporting platforms provide actionable insights to support compliance and cost efficiency.

For UK organisations aiming to implement these practices effectively, Hokstad Consulting offers tailored expertise in embedding compliance measures into DevOps workflows while ensuring cost-effective operations and adherence to regulatory requirements.

UK Business Requirements

UK businesses face the dual challenge of adhering to strict data protection laws while meeting precise financial reporting standards. Successfully managing cloud costs in this environment requires careful compliance with evolving regulations and a tailored approach to UK-specific requirements.

UK Regulatory Compliance

The regulatory landscape for UK businesses is constantly shifting, particularly in the area of data protection. Organisations in the UK that handle data belonging to EU citizens must comply with EU data sovereignty rules [8], creating a complex dual framework that demands careful management.

The UK Data (Access and Use) Act 2025 (DUA Act) introduces a new era for data protection laws in the UK [31][32]. This legislation is designed to modernise data practices, encourage innovation, and simplify compliance while staying aligned with the key principles of the UK GDPR. However, the stakes are high, with fines reaching up to £17.5 million or 4% of annual global turnover for non-compliance [32]. Additionally, UK organisations must prepare for the EU Data Act, which will be enforced from 12 September 2025 and carries similar penalties for breaches [8].

A stark reminder of the importance of compliance came in May 2025, when the Legal Aid Agency suffered a data breach that exposed over two million sensitive records [34]. This incident highlighted the critical nature of data sovereignty, which ensures that data is stored within the UK, governed by UK laws, and protected from foreign access or surveillance [34].

To meet these stringent requirements, organisations need to reassess their compliance strategies in light of the DUA Act. Key steps include understanding whose data is being collected, ensuring storage vendors meet compliance standards, and reviewing cloud contracts to address potential conflicts with the EU Data Act [33]. A comprehensive approach is essential - one that considers legal, technical, and organisational aspects of data sovereignty [35].

GBP (£) and UK Formatting Standards

In addition to data protection rules, UK businesses must also align their financial reporting with domestic standards. Financial Reporting Standard 102 (FRS 102), a cornerstone of the UK GAAP framework, governs how businesses report their finances, including cloud-related costs [36]. Updates from the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in March 2024 introduced significant changes to FRS 102, particularly in areas like revenue and lease accounting, which directly impact tracking and reporting of cloud expenses [37].

Cloud cost management systems must also meet UK-specific formatting requirements. This includes showing costs in GBP (£), using the DD/MM/YYYY date format, and adhering to metric measurements. Companies should evaluate whether their existing IT systems can effectively track and disclose cloud-related contracts in line with these standards [37].

Major cloud providers offer tools with features designed to support compliance:

Managing these dual requirements - data protection and financial reporting - requires both technical expertise and a deep understanding of regulatory frameworks. For businesses aiming to meet these demands while keeping costs under control, specialised knowledge in compliance and cloud cost management is essential.

Getting Ready for Cloud Cost Compliance in 2025

With cloud costs on the rise and regulations tightening, UK organisations need to act now to prepare for the compliance challenges of 2025. Those who develop strong compliance strategies will be better positioned to thrive in this evolving landscape.

Main Trends and Findings

Recent trends paint a clear picture: 92% of UK businesses now use hybrid or multi-cloud setups to maintain flexibility. However, the regulatory environment is becoming more complex, compounded by a 40% increase in ransomware attacks [2].

The pressure to adapt is evident. 85% of UK respondents anticipate changes to their compliance strategies in response to new regulations like the EU AI Act, DORA, and the NIS2 Directive [40].

Audit quality is a top priority: 95% of respondents in the UK view high-quality audits as critical, and 89% are advancing their AI compliance policies [40].

The financial benefits of robust compliance are also clear. 74% of cloud-based firms report profit growth, compared to 65% of traditional businesses [38]. Dayle Rodriguez, Systems Advisory Manager at Kreston Reeves LLP, explains:

The profit growth for cloud-based firms isn't surprising. Logging into, and loading up, a desktop system can take anywhere between 2 to 6 minutes depending on the size of the organisation e.g. a larger chart of accounts. If you're a large firm, multiply 6 minutes by 100 or 200 clients that you do weekly bookkeeping for, and you can see there's already a time loss in this one area. [38]

These findings highlight the growing importance of targeted compliance initiatives as organisations prepare for the future.

Next Steps for UK Organisations

To meet the demands of 2025, UK organisations need to take clear and measurable steps. For starters, 85% of businesses plan to conduct ISO 27001 audits [40]. This widely recognised framework provides a strong base for managing cybersecurity risks and adapting to regulatory changes.

AI compliance readiness is another critical area. 71% of UKI companies are planning AI audits or certifications within the next two years [40]. To move from policy to practice, organisations should establish governance structures and document their processes thoroughly.

Integrating compliance into DevOps is also gaining traction. 43% of organisations now assign dedicated security roles within their platforms [41]. This approach treats compliance like infrastructure - defining it as code, versioning it, and systematically reviewing it.

Data residency and local support have become essential for meeting regulatory requirements and building trust [2]. Automated controls are another game-changer, cutting IT management time by up to 45% while simplifying compliance and audit processes [1]. Steve Robinson, CEO of Hyperglance, underscores this point:

Security and compliance shouldn't be afterthoughts, they should be automated, integrated, and continuous. [39]

Insurance adds another layer of urgency. Insurers are increasingly scrutinising cloud security postures, which can directly impact cyber insurance premiums [2]. Strong security measures - like multi-factor authentication and encryption - are now essential for both compliance and cost management.

Organisations must juggle regulatory compliance, cost efficiency, operational effectiveness, and risk management. A systematic approach, supported by the right frameworks and expert guidance, will help businesses navigate these challenges successfully.

For those seeking expert assistance, Hokstad Consulting offers tailored solutions in cloud cost management and DevOps transformation, helping businesses optimise costs while maintaining strong compliance across various hosting environments.

FAQs