How Real-Time Data Sync Works in Hybrid Clouds

Real-time data synchronisation ensures systems in hybrid cloud setups stay updated instantly as changes happen. Unlike batch processing, which updates at intervals, real-time sync continuously shares and reconciles data. This is critical for applications like financial transactions or live data feeds, where even slight delays can cause issues.

Key takeaways:

• Why It Matters: Keeps data consistent across on-premises and cloud systems, improves decision-making, and prevents workflow disruptions.
• Techniques Used: Change Data Capture (CDC), event-driven sync, push/pull methods, and data mirroring.
• Challenges: Network latency (75–200ms, peaking at 2.5x) and security risks when connecting public and private systems.
• Conflict Resolution: Strategies like Last Write Wins (LWW), manual review, or predefined business rules prevent data overwrites.
• Automation's Role: Reduces manual effort, scales resources during demand spikes, and ensures smooth failover processes.
• Tools: Platforms like Apache Kafka, Airbyte, and Hevo Data enable real-time sync with varying strengths and costs.

Hybrid cloud systems benefit from real-time sync by maintaining data integrity, improving resource use, and reducing manual errors. Overcoming latency, security, and cost challenges requires careful planning and the right tools.

Simplify Hybrid Storage with Azure File & Sync – Step-by-Step Guide!

Core Principles and Techniques of Real-Time Data Sync

Real-time data synchronisation is at the heart of modern hybrid cloud integration, enabling smooth and consistent data flow between on-premises systems and cloud platforms.

Key Sync Methods

Several techniques are commonly used to achieve real-time data synchronisation:

• Change Data Capture (CDC): This method tracks row-level changes by monitoring transactional logs or triggers, enabling low-latency data replication.

• Event-Driven Synchronisation: Changes in data are transformed into events within a stream, which allows multiple systems to process updates independently and simultaneously. This approach offers scalability and flexibility in distributed setups.

• Push-Based vs Pull-Based Sync: The choice between these methods depends on specific needs. Push-based systems send updates immediately as changes occur, making them faster but reliant on strong network connectivity. Pull-based systems, on the other hand, allow target systems to request updates on a schedule, offering more control at the cost of higher latency.

• Data Mirroring: This technique creates identical copies of data across different storage devices. Updates to the primary system are instantly replicated to secondary systems, ensuring redundancy and quick failover capabilities.

• File Synchronisation: For organisations handling diverse data types, file synchronisation ensures that all file instances remain current when changes are made to the primary version. Incremental transfers are often used, updating only the modified portions to save bandwidth.

These methods form the foundation of real-time data sync, but managing simultaneous updates adds complexity, requiring robust conflict resolution strategies.

Two-Way Sync and Conflict Resolution

Two-way synchronisation ensures continuous updates by simultaneously pushing and pulling changes, regardless of where they originate. This is especially beneficial in hybrid storage setups, where consistency between on-premises and cloud-based systems is critical.

However, bidirectional sync can lead to conflicts when multiple systems update the same data point simultaneously. Without proper detection and resolution, these conflicts risk overwriting valid changes, potentially causing data loss. To address this, several conflict resolution strategies are available:

The right strategy depends on the nature of the data, application needs, and user expectations. Combining automated rules for routine conflicts with manual intervention for complex cases often proves effective in critical systems.

The Role of Automation in Sync Workflows

Automation is a game-changer for real-time sync workflows, turning what could be a laborious manual process into an efficient and reliable operation. Automated tools monitor for issues, adapt in real time, and ensure consistent data availability across hybrid environments.

Modern automation solutions simplify continuous data protection and workload synchronisation by automating replication between on-premises and cloud environments. They also handle automated failover and failback processes, offering non-disruptive testing and real-time monitoring to minimise manual oversight and downtime.

Another advantage of automation is its ability to dynamically scale synchronisation resources based on real-time demand. This ensures optimal performance, even during data spikes or peak usage periods.

Today’s platforms support real-time and two-way synchronisation across CRMs, ERPs, and databases. Engineers can use these tools to sync and consolidate data at scale, freeing teams to focus on core business goals instead of managing complex API integrations.

As Andrew Fanning, Enterprise Architect at CDW, aptly puts it:

So, if I need to deploy on-prem versus the cloud, I can hide some of that in code behind automation, and automation can lead to a more seamless way for the end user to request services, regardless of the location. [8]

Automation also ensures standardised processes and policies across hybrid and multi-cloud setups. By reducing configuration errors and ensuring consistent behaviour across platforms, it improves reliability while lowering operational costs.

Step-by-Step Workflow for Real-Time Data Sync in Hybrid Clouds

Breaking down real-time data synchronisation into clear steps helps illustrate how information flows smoothly between on-premises systems and cloud environments. Each phase builds on the last, ensuring a seamless process.

Change Detection and Event Generation

The process kicks off by identifying data changes. One of the most effective methods for this is log-based Change Data Capture (CDC). This technique monitors database transaction logs - like PostgreSQL's Write-Ahead Logs (WAL) or MySQL's binary logs - to track changes such as inserts, updates, and deletes. Impressively, log-based CDC operates with sub-second latency while adding only a minimal load of 1–3% to the system [10].

Change Data Capture (CDC) is a technique used to detect and record changes such as inserts, updates, and deletes in a database. CDC improves data efficiency by capturing only changed records, making it essential for real-time data replication, ETL pipelines, and syncing data across systems.
– Rivery [9]

Other methods, like trigger-based or query-based approaches, are available but often come with drawbacks in terms of performance and latency [10]. Once changes are detected, events are created. These events carry vital details about the changes - what occurred, when it happened, and how it should be processed further down the pipeline.

Data Transformation and Transmission

After generating events, the data undergoes transformation to meet the requirements of its destination or to comply with regulations. This might involve ETL/ELT processes, schema mapping, aggregation, enrichment, or even redacting sensitive information [6][2].

For instance, in January 2023, a healthcare provider synchronised patient encounter records from on-premises clinical systems to a cloud analytics platform. To comply with data privacy laws, their system used a policy engine to apply field-level redaction, pseudonymisation, or suppression to sensitive data [2].

Once transformed, the data is transmitted using tools like Apache Kafka, which ensures durable and ordered delivery of events.

Streaming data platforms and message brokers have become integral to synchronisation pipelines, providing durable, ordered delivery of change events. Stream-processing frameworks enable transformations, enrichment, and routing of these events, facilitating complex synchronisation topologies such as fan-out to multiple consumers and selective replication based on business rules.
– John A. Reynolds et al. [2]

Cost management is another critical consideration during transmission. For example, Fanatics, a sports merchandise retailer, used CDC to replicate 100 TB of data from various systems to an analytics platform on Amazon S3. By applying CDC for both the initial load and subsequent updates, they reduced WAN bandwidth costs while maintaining uptime and gaining real-time insights into customer behaviour [11]. Additionally, idempotent writes ensure that target systems handle replays and at-least-once delivery scenarios effectively [2].

Monitoring and Error Handling

Once data is transformed and transmitted, continuous monitoring ensures the pipeline remains reliable and efficient. Observability is key, relying on metrics, end-to-end tracing, and alerts for issues like lag, error rates, or throughput [2]. In fact, 62% of enterprises reported at least one outage last year due to delayed anomaly detection in distributed systems. However, those using AI-driven anomaly detection have cut recovery times by up to 40% [14].

Modern monitoring techniques focus on tracking performance metrics such as CPU usage, memory consumption, and network latency. High-percentile response times are monitored to catch early signs of degradation [14]. By correlating tracing data with logs and metrics, organisations - like major retailers and financial firms - have reduced incident resolution times by 40–50% [14].

Error handling complements monitoring to maintain reliability. In cases involving multi-master or multi-source systems, conflict resolution strategies - like last-writer-wins, version vectors, or domain-specific merge functions - are critical [2]. Automated alerts, integrated with tools like Slack or PagerDuty, ensure immediate notifications when thresholds are exceeded [12][13]. Some systems even feature automated remediation, triggering predefined corrective actions as soon as problems arise.

Security monitoring adds another layer of protection. Data moving across public networks or stored in third-party clouds must be encrypted both in transit and at rest [2]. Systems should also monitor unusual traffic, access attempts, or resource spikes that could indicate security threats [13]. Monitoring also helps manage costs by identifying opportunities to optimise processes, such as filtering or compressing data, batching updates, and using tiered consistency models. This approach can significantly reduce expenses without sacrificing performance [2].

Tools and Platforms for Real-Time Hybrid Cloud Data Sync

Choosing the right tools is a critical step in setting up effective synchronisation workflows. With a variety of platforms tailored for hybrid cloud environments, each comes with its own set of features designed to address specific needs.

Here’s a look at some of the top platforms that simplify and optimise hybrid cloud synchronisation.

Overview of Leading Sync Tools

Apache Kafka stands out as a distributed streaming platform trusted by 80% of Fortune 100 companies for their data pipelines [15]. It handles massive data volumes - processing 50 to 80 terabytes daily - with single-cluster setups managing a sustained throughput of 2.8 million messages per second [4]. This makes Kafka ideal for organisations that need high-throughput, low-latency synchronisation across complex hybrid infrastructures.

Airbyte appeals to users with its open-source foundation and capacity-based pricing. With over 600 connectors, it boasts a 4.5/5 rating, thanks to its user-friendly interface and active community support. However, self-hosting requires some technical know-how [20].

Hevo Data focuses on near real-time synchronisation, leveraging Change Data Capture (CDC) technology. Supporting over 150 data sources, it features automated schema mapping and offers a free tier alongside budget-friendly plans. With a 4.4/5 rating on Gartner Peer Insights, users appreciate its responsive support and clear documentation [19].

Azure Data Factory provides serverless scalability with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it a strong choice for organisations already using Microsoft's ecosystem. It supports real-time data movement and CDC across more than 90 connectors, though costs can rise significantly with heavy usage [16][20].

For enterprise-scale needs, Qlik Replicate delivers high-speed, real-time data replication and excels in SAP environments. Its ability to handle heterogeneous databases and automated schema evolution capabilities make it a popular choice for large, complex systems [17][18].

The right platform often depends on your specific hybrid architecture needs. For instance, event-driven architectures have shown to improve system responsiveness by 57% while reducing integration complexity by 65% [4].

Apache Flink adds another layer by enabling stream processing. Its production setups process an average of 1.8 million events per second per node, with 98% of events processed in under 150 milliseconds [4]. This makes Flink invaluable for real-time data transformations within hybrid synchronisation workflows.

Modern CDC implementations across these platforms can handle approximately 18,000 changes per minute, offering latency reductions of up to 65% compared to older synchronisation methods [4].

How Hokstad Consulting Can Help

Real-time data synchronisation in hybrid cloud environments is no small feat - it requires careful planning, the right tools, and expert guidance. This is where Hokstad Consulting steps in, offering tailored solutions to optimise complex workflows.

Their team specialises in evaluating your current hybrid architecture to recommend the most effective synchronisation tools based on factors like data volume, latency requirements, and budget. Many organisations rely on a mix of synchronisation patterns, making expert advice essential.

But selecting the right tools is just the beginning. Hokstad Consulting ensures optimal performance through expert integration. Their services include:

• Cloud cost audits: Identifying inefficiencies that may be driving up expenses. Their cloud cost engineering strategies have reduced costs by 30–50%.
• CI/CD pipelines: Implementing automated pipelines for reliable deployments and monitoring.
• Infrastructure monitoring: Tracking synchronisation performance, detecting bottlenecks, and applying automated fixes where needed.

For companies with unique requirements, Hokstad Consulting can develop custom synchronisation solutions tailored to fit seamlessly within existing hybrid infrastructures. Their expertise also extends to advanced caching and offloading techniques, which can reduce database requests by up to 80%, significantly improving performance [15].

Whether through a retainer model or project-based engagements, Hokstad Consulting ensures your hybrid cloud synchronisation setup remains efficient, secure, and scalable as your business evolves.

Best Practices for Reliable and Cost-Effective Real-Time Sync

Achieving smooth real-time data synchronisation in hybrid cloud environments means finding a balance between performance needs and budget limits. The secret lies in carefully managing sync frequency, building systems that can handle disruptions, and maintaining clear visibility into your operations.

Optimising Sync Frequency and Costs

To keep costs under control while ensuring efficient synchronisation, businesses should aim for what’s known as a 'hybrid equilibrium' - a balance between on-premises and cloud services that maximises performance while keeping expenses in check [1].

This balance is not a one-size-fits-all solution. With 40% of workloads still relying on on-premises data centres, companies need flexible strategies that can adjust to shifting demands [1]. A key part of this is understanding the cost of each transaction and placing workloads strategically [1]. For example:

• Stable workloads are often cheaper to run on-premises.
• Public cloud resources can be tapped for dynamic scaling during peak times or for specialised services [1].

Even small cost savings can have a big impact. For instance, reducing cloud spending by just 1% could free up at least £1 million for reinvestment in other areas like software development [1].

Different synchronisation methods also affect costs and performance. Real-time techniques like Change Data Capture (CDC) or event-based sync (using tools like Kafka or webhooks) minimise delays but can be expensive to operate [7]. On the other hand, periodic refreshes or batch processing are more affordable, though they come with slight delays in data availability [7]. Many systems combine these methods - for example, using real-time sync for critical customer data while relying on batch processing for analytics workloads.

Other cost-saving tactics include:

• Dynamic scaling: Adjust resources based on data volume [1].
• Data compression and deduplication: Reduce data sizes to lower transmission and storage costs [21].

Once costs and sync frequency are optimised, the focus should shift to building systems that can handle disruptions while scaling effectively.

Ensuring Resilience and Scalability

A resilient and scalable synchronisation system is essential, especially when outages can cost upwards of £300,000 per hour, with some companies risking losses of £1–£5 million [24]. Considering that 89% of enterprises use multi-cloud setups and 73% rely on hybrid cloud models, robust systems are no longer optional [24].

Automation plays a key role here. It ensures consistency, speeds up processes, and reduces human errors in tasks like infrastructure provisioning and application deployment [23][24]. For example, over 70% of AWS users now use serverless options like AWS Lambda, which automatically scales without manual input [24].

Other strategies for resilience and scalability include:

• Service decoupling: Isolate components so that one failure doesn’t bring down the entire system [23][24].
• Multi-region availability: Spread critical components across multiple regions to protect against outages and reduce latency. Use global load balancers and cross-region replication for disaster recovery [23][24].
• Containerisation and microservices: Package applications into portable containers managed by tools like Kubernetes. This ensures consistent performance and easy scaling across environments. As Martin Fowler, a British software engineer, explains:

Almost all the successful microservice stories have started with a monolith that got too big and was broken up. Almost all the cases where I've heard of a system that was built as a microservice system from scratch, it has ended up in serious trouble. [24]

• Managed services: Use cloud providers’ managed solutions for compute, storage, and databases. These often include built-in redundancy and load balancing, reducing operational overhead [23].

AI is also becoming a game-changer. Machine learning can predict scaling needs, optimise load balancing, and detect anomalies early, preventing small issues from escalating [24][3]. Additionally, in-memory caching tools like Redis can improve data retrieval speeds and reduce database requests by up to 80%, supporting performance during peak loads [15][23].

Monitoring and Operational Transparency

Effective monitoring is critical to identifying and resolving issues before they impact operations. Beyond basic uptime checks, modern monitoring tools provide detailed, near-real-time insights into infrastructure, applications, and data pipelines [27].

Key metrics to track include error rates, uptime, data freshness, and records processed. Platforms like Datadog and New Relic offer unified dashboards with AI-driven anomaly detection, while open-source tools like Prometheus and Grafana are ideal for Kubernetes environments [25][26][27].

AI-powered monitoring can identify subtle patterns that might go unnoticed, allowing teams to address issues proactively [25][26][27]. Automated conflict detection and resolution within sync platforms further ensures data consistency, reducing manual effort [6]. Centralised logging with distributed tracing also simplifies troubleshooting and supports compliance needs [23][24].

For hybrid setups, monitoring tools must address security and integrity challenges across multiple environments. The ability to correlate events and metrics across platforms provides a unified view of system health, making it easier to maintain stability in complex architectures [28].

Conclusion

Real-time data synchronisation in hybrid cloud environments has become a cornerstone for modern businesses. With 73% of companies now adopting hybrid cloud solutions, organisations are seeking a balance between flexibility, performance, and cost management to remain competitive [22].

To achieve success in hybrid cloud systems, mastering the essentials - like Change Data Capture (CDC), event-driven updates, and conflict resolution - is non-negotiable [15]. When paired with automation and robust monitoring, these elements ensure distributed systems operate smoothly and efficiently.

Cost control is another critical factor, especially when data quality issues cost U.S. companies $3.1 trillion annually [15]. Strategies such as dynamic scaling, which can lower operational expenses by 30%, and effective caching, which reduces database requests by up to 80%, highlight how careful planning can deliver both financial and performance gains [15].

Building resilience is equally vital. With four out of five companies experiencing unplanned outages in recent years - potentially costing between £300,000 and £5 million per hour - it's clear that robust systems are a necessity [15]. Implementing automation, ensuring multi-region availability, and using AI-driven monitoring can create a scalable and reliable infrastructure. Additionally, well-defined governance plays a key role in maintaining consistency and accountability.

Establish clear governance policies: Develop comprehensive governance policies that define roles, responsibilities, and procedures for managing cloud resources. This helps ensure accountability and consistent management practices across the hybrid environment. - Jon Toor, CMO, Cloudian [5]

Hokstad Consulting exemplifies this strategic approach by offering tailored solutions that balance cost, performance, and security. Their no savings, no fee model allows organisations to explore cost-saving opportunities through a free assessment, removing the barrier of upfront investment [29].

As the shift towards distributed architectures continues - evidenced by 82% of organisations now embracing multi-cloud strategies - success in hybrid cloud synchronisation hinges on both technical expertise and strategic foresight [15]. By applying the best practices outlined here and seeking expert guidance, businesses can build synchronisation systems that enhance reliability, control costs, and deliver a competitive edge.

FAQs